Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 321

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma

Open access
Melmed, Shlomo, Kaiser, Ursula B, Lopes, M Beatriz, Bertherat, Jerome, Syro, Luis V, Raverot, Gerald, Reincke, Martin, Johannsson, Gudmundur, Beckers, Albert, Fleseriu, Maria, Giustina, Andrea, Wass, John A H, Ho, Ken K Y·2022·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

All endocrine glands are susceptible to neoplastic growth, yet the health consequences of these neoplasms differ between endocrine tissues. Pituitary neoplasms are highly prevalent and overwhelmingly benign, exhibiting a spectrum of diverse behaviors and impact on health. To understand the clinical biology of these common yet often innocuous neoplasms, we review pituitary physiology and adenoma epidemiology, pathophysiology, behavior, and clinical consequences. The anterior pituitary develops in response to a range of complex brain signals integrating with intrinsic ectodermal cell transcriptional events that together determine gland growth, cell type differentiation, and hormonal production, in turn maintaining optimal endocrine health. Pituitary adenomas occur in 10% of the population; however, the overwhelming majority remain harmless during life. Triggered by somatic or germline mutations, disease-causing adenomas manifest pathogenic mechanisms that disrupt intrapituitary signaling to promote benign cell proliferation associated with chromosomal instability. Cellular senescence acts as a mechanistic buffer protecting against malignant transformation, an extremely rare event. It is estimated that fewer than one-thousandth of all pituitary adenomas cause clinically significant disease. Adenomas variably and adversely affect morbidity and mortality depending on cell type, hormone secretory activity, and growth behavior. For most clinically apparent adenomas, multimodal therapy controlling hormone secretion and adenoma growth lead to improved quality of life and normalized mortality. The clinical biology of pituitary adenomas, and particularly their benign nature, stands in marked contrast to other tumors of the endocrine system, such as thyroid and neuroendocrine tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/endrev/bnac010

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Cited by

See all 321

Metadata

Authors
Melmed, S., Kaiser, U. B., Lopes, M. B., Bertherat, J., Syro, L. V., Raverot, G., Reincke, M., Johannsson, G., Beckers, A., Fleseriu, M., Giustina, A., Wass, J. A. H., & Ho, K. K. Y.
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2022-04-08
Volume
43
Issue
6
Pages
1003-1037
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W4223632466
Cited by
321
References
19
FWCI
38.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/endrev/bnac010
The paper
Melmed, S., Kaiser, U. B., Lopes, M. B., Bertherat, J., Syro, L. V., Raverot, G., Reincke, M., Johannsson, G., Beckers, A., Fleseriu, M., Giustina, A., Wass, J. A. H., & Ho, K. K. Y. (2022). Clinical Biology of the Pituitary Adenoma. Endocrine Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1210/endrev/bnac010

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.