The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Spoiled Gradient Recalled Acquisition in the Steady State Technique Is Superior to Conventional Postcontrast Spin Echo Technique for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Pituitary Tumors
Abstract
Recent studies show that the standard T1-weighted spin echo (SE) technique for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fails to identify 40% of corticotrope adenomas. We hypothesized that the superior soft tissue contrast and thinner sections obtained with spoiled gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state (SPGR) would improve tumor detection. We compared the performance of SE and SPGR MRI in 50 patients (age, 7-67 yr) with surgically confirmed corticotrope adenoma. Coronal SE and SPGR MR images were obtained before and after administration of gadolinium contrast, using a 1.5 T scanner. SE scans were obtained over 5.1 min (12-cm field of view; interleaved sections, 3 mm). SPGR scans were obtained over 3.45 min (12- or 18-cm field of view, contiguous 1- or 2-mm slices). The MRI interpretations of two radiologists were compared with findings at surgical resection. Compared with SE for detection of tumor, SPGR had superior sensitivity (80%; confidence interval, 68-91; vs. 49%; confidence interval, 34-63%), but a higher false positive rate (2% vs. 4%). We recommend the addition of SPGR to SE sequences using pituitary-specific technical parameters to improve the MRI detection of ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lacroix, A., Feelders, R. A., Stratakis, C. A., & Nieman, L. K. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61375-1 · Cited by 1,777
Self-citationTreatment of Cushing's syndrome: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline
Nieman, L. K., Biller, B. M. K., Findling, J. W., Murad, M. H., Newell-Price, J., Savage, M. O., & Tabarin, A. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2015-1818 · Cited by 1,270
Self-citationCushing’s Syndrome: important issues in diagnosis and management
Findling, J. W., & Raff, H. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0997 · Cited by 294
Young, J., Haissaguerre, M., Viera-Pinto, O., Chabre, O., Baudin, E., & Tabarin, A. (2020) · European Journal of Endocrinology · doi:10.1530/eje-19-0877 · Cited by 232
Cushing's disease: pathobiology, diagnosis, and management
Lonser, R. R., Nieman, L., & Oldfield, E. H. (2017) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2016.1.jns152119 · Cited by 215
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Patronas, N., Bulakbasi, N., Stratakis, C. A., Lafferty, A., Oldfield, E. H., Doppman, J., & Nieman, L. K.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2003-04
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1565-1569
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1969677811
- Cited by
- 185
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Spoiled Gradient Recalled Acquisition in the Steady State Technique Is Superior to Conventional Postcontrast Spin Echo Technique for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Pituitary Tumors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2002-021438
- The paper
- Patronas, N., Bulakbasi, N., Stratakis, C. A., Lafferty, A., Oldfield, E. H., Doppman, J., & Nieman, L. K. (2003). Spoiled Gradient Recalled Acquisition in the Steady State Technique Is Superior to Conventional Postcontrast Spin Echo Technique for Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detection of Adrenocorticotropin-Secreting Pituitary Tumors. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021438
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.