The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Whole-Body 11C-5-Hydroxytryptophan Positron Emission Tomography as a Universal Imaging Technique for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and Computed Tomography
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be small and situated almost anywhere throughout the body. Our objective was to investigate whether whole-body (WB) positron emission tomography (PET) with 11C-5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP) can be used as a universal imaging technique for NETs and to compare this technique with established imaging methods. Forty-two consecutive patients with evidence of NET and a detected lesion on any conventional imaging (six bronchial, two foregut, 16 midgut, and two thymic carcinoids; one ectopic Cushing’s syndrome; four gastrinomas; one insulinoma; six nonfunctioning endocrine pancreatic tumors; one gastric carcinoid, one paraganglioma; and two endocrine-differentiated pancreatic carcinomas) were studied. The WB-11C-5-HTP-PET examinations were compared with WB-computed tomography (CT) and somatostatin receptor scintigraphy (SRS). Tumor lesions were imaged with PET in 95% of the patients. In 58% of the patients, PET could detect more lesions than SRS and CT and equal numbers in 34%, whereas in three cases, SRS or CT showed more lesions. In 84% (16 of 19 patients), PET could visualize the primary tumor compared with 47 and 42% for SRS and CT, respectively. The surgically removed PET-positive primary tumor sizes were 6–30 mm. To conclude, this study indicates that WB-11C-5-HTP-PET can be used as a universal imaging method for detection of NETs. This study also shows that WB-11C-HTP-PET is sensitive in imaging small NET lesions, such as primary tumors, and can in a majority of cases image significantly more tumor lesions than SRS and CT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lacroix, A., Feelders, R. A., Stratakis, C. A., & Nieman, L. K. (2015) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)61375-1 · Cited by 1,777
Pavel, M., Baudin, E., Couvelard, A., Krenning, E., Öberg, K., Steinmüller, T., Anlauf, M., Wiedenmann, B., & Salazar, R. (2012) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000335597 · Cited by 873
ENETS Consensus Guidelines Update for Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of the Jejunum and Ileum
Niederle, B., Pape, U.-F., Costa, F., Gross, D., Kelestimur, F., Knigge, U., Öberg, K., Pavel, M., Perren, A., Toumpanakis, C., et al. (2016) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000443170 · Cited by 474
Self-citationCushing’s Syndrome: important issues in diagnosis and management
Findling, J. W., & Raff, H. (2006) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2006-0997 · Cited by 294
Eriksson, B., Klöppel, G., Krenning, E., Ahlman, H., Plöckinger, U., Wiedenmann, B., Arnold, R., Auernhammer, C., Körner, M., Rindi, G., et al. (2008) · Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1159/000111034 · Cited by 254
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Orlefors, H., Sundin, A., Garske, U., Juhlin, C., Oberg, K., Skogseid, B., Langstrom, B., Bergstrom, M., & Eriksson, B.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2005-06-01
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 3392-3400
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2142340968
- Cited by
- 329
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-Body 11C-5-Hydroxytryptophan Positron Emission Tomography as a Universal Imaging Technique for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and Computed Tomography. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2004-1938
- The paper
- Orlefors, H., Sundin, A., Garske, U., Juhlin, C., Oberg, K., Skogseid, B., Langstrom, B., Bergstrom, M., & Eriksson, B. (2005). Whole-Body 11C-5-Hydroxytryptophan Positron Emission Tomography as a Universal Imaging Technique for Neuroendocrine Tumors: Comparison with Somatostatin Receptor Scintigraphy and Computed Tomography. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-1938
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.