Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 215

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Critical Analysis of Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage during Primary Medical Therapy in Acromegaly

Melmed, Shlomo, Sternberg, Richard, Cook, David, Klibanski, Anne, Chanson, Philippe, Bonert, Vivien, Vance, Mary Lee, Rhew, David, Kleinberg, David, Barkan, Ariel·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Somatostatin analogs have been successfully used to treat patients with GH-secreting pituitary adenomas because they are safe, effective, and usually well tolerated. The results of studies evaluating acromegaly treatment with the somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs), octreotide and lanreotide, have supported the use of these agents for primary medical therapy before or as an alternative to traditional interventions of surgery and radiotherapy in selected cases. Evidence Acquisition: We therefore undertook a systematic literature overview to characterize the results of studies involving primary therapy with somatostatin analogs and their effects on pituitary tumor size. Because most studies in which pituitary tumor shrinkage has been assessed involve uncontrolled, open-label, prospective trials or retrospective case series, the lack of a control arm does not permit pooling of data in a metaanalytic fashion to determine tumor size reduction. Therefore, this systematic review was designed to document and stratify data by study design, summarize therapeutic regimens and patient characteristics, assess the percentage of patients showing changes in tumor size, and calculate the weighted average effect on size reduction. Evidence Synthesis: Overall, for patients who experience significant shrinkage, an approximately 50% decrease in pituitary mass is achieved when a somatostatin analog is used exclusively or before surgery or radiotherapy. Fourteen studies (n = 424) provided a definition of significant tumor shrinkage, and the results showed that 36.6% (weighted mean percentage) of patients receiving primary SRL therapy for acromegaly experienced a significant reduction in tumor size. The weighted mean percent reduction in tumor size was 19.4% for those studies in which all patients received SRLs and change in tumor size was reported for all patients. Conclusions: Clinical implications are discussed for patients in whom tumor size control with SRLs is an important objective, typically those who have failed surgery or are being treated with primary medical therapy with large tumors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2004-2466

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 215

Metadata

Authors
Melmed, S., Sternberg, R., Cook, D., Klibanski, A., Chanson, P., Bonert, V., Vance, M. L., Rhew, D., Kleinberg, D., & Barkan, A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-07-01
Volume
90
Issue
7
Pages
4405-4410
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2040054585
Cited by
215
References
0
FWCI
12.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Critical Analysis of Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage during Primary Medical Therapy in Acromegaly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2004-2466
The paper
Melmed, S., Sternberg, R., Cook, D., Klibanski, A., Chanson, P., Bonert, V., Vance, M. L., Rhew, D., Kleinberg, D., & Barkan, A. (2005). A Critical Analysis of Pituitary Tumor Shrinkage during Primary Medical Therapy in Acromegaly. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2004-2466

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.