Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 423

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Randomized, Single Blind Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Steroid Monotherapy in Graves’ Orbitopathy

Kahaly, George J., Pitz, Susanne, Hommel, Gerhard, Dittmar, Manuela·2005·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Glucocorticoids are effective for severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO), which causes substantial morbidity. The question at issue is how best to use them. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to optimize glucocorticoid application in GO. DESIGN: The study design was a randomized trial over 12 wk with 6-month follow-up. SETTING: The study was performed at university joint thyroid and ophthalmic clinics. PATIENTS: Seventy euthyroid out-patients with untreated, active, and severe GO were studied. INTERVENTION: Patients received either once weekly iv methylprednisolone (0.5 g, then 0.25 g, 6 wk each) or oral prednisolone starting with 0.1 g/d, then tapering the dose by 0.01 g/wk. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 3 months, the primary end point was a composite of improvements in proptosis, lid fissure width, and rate of diplopia in primary gaze, visual acuity, eye muscle thickness, and patient's quality of life. RESULTS: Intravenous glucocorticoid therapy resulted in rapid, significant, and sustained improvement. At 3 months, 27 of 35 patients (77%) in the iv group had a treatment response compared with 18 of 35 (51%) in the oral group (P < 0.01). Improvements over baseline values for disease severity (e.g. visual acuity; P = 0.01) and activity (e.g. chemosis; P < 0.01) and for quality of life (P < 0.001) were greater in the iv group. TSH receptor antibody titers decreased during iv steroid administration (P < 0.001), and smoking had a strong impact on the therapy response (P < 0.001). Additional treatment was required less frequently in the iv group. Intravenous steroids were safe, with different rates of adverse events between the two groups (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active and severe GO, iv glucocorticoids were more effective and better tolerated than oral steroids.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2005-0148

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 423

Metadata

Authors
Kahaly, G. J., Pitz, S., Hommel, G., & Dittmar, M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2005-09
Volume
90
Issue
9
Pages
5234-5240
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2066663435
Cited by
423
References
0
FWCI
6.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, Single Blind Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Steroid Monotherapy in Graves’ Orbitopathy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2005-0148
The paper
Kahaly, G. J., Pitz, S., Hommel, G., & Dittmar, M. (2005). Randomized, Single Blind Trial of Intravenous versus Oral Steroid Monotherapy in Graves’ Orbitopathy. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-0148

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.