Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin Syndrome: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Management, and Long-Term Follow-Up

Open access
Isidori, Andrea M., Kaltsas, Gregory A., Pozza, Carlotta, Frajese, Vanni, Newell-Price, John, Reznek, Rodney H., Jenkins, Paul J., Monson, John P., Grossman, Ashley B., Besser, G. Michael·2006·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: There are few large series of patients with ectopic, nonpituitary, corticotropin (ACTH) secretion (EAS). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical, biochemical, and radiological features, management, and treatment outcome of patients with EAS. DESIGN: This was a retrospective case-record study. SETTING: The setting for this study was a tertiary referral hospital center. PATIENTS: Forty patients with EAS were studied. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical, biochemical, and radiological features and response to therapy and survival were measured. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 5 yr (range, 2-30 yr). None of the dynamic tests achieved 100% accuracy, but bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling showed an absent central gradient in all but one case (one of 12). Imaging correctly identified the lesion at first investigation in 65% of cases. Bronchial carcinoid tumors were the most common cause of EAS (n = 12; 30%), followed by other neuroendocrine tumors (n = 13, 32.5%). In 12.5% of patients, the source of EAS was never found. Octreotide scintigraphy and whole-body venous sampling were of limited value. Surgical attempt at curative resection was successful in 83% (10 of 12) of patients with bronchial carcinoid tumors; others responded generally well to adrenolytic therapy or bilateral adrenalectomy. Tumor histology and the presence of distant metastases were the main predictors of overall survival (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A variety of tests and imaging studies are necessary for the correct diagnosis of the EAS, but even then, up to 20% of cases present a covert or occult EAS syndrome. These cases require a prolonged follow-up, review, and repetition of diagnostic tests and scans.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2005-1542

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Isidori, A. M., Kaltsas, G. A., Pozza, C., Frajese, V., Newell-Price, J., Reznek, R. H., Jenkins, P. J., Monson, J. P., Grossman, A. B., & Besser, G. M.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2006-02
Volume
91
Issue
2
Pages
371-377
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2132647852
Cited by
522
References
4
FWCI
16.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin Syndrome: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Management, and Long-Term Follow-Up. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2005-1542
The paper
Isidori, A. M., Kaltsas, G. A., Pozza, C., Frajese, V., Newell-Price, J., Reznek, R. H., Jenkins, P. J., Monson, J. P., Grossman, A. B., & Besser, G. M. (2006). The Ectopic Adrenocorticotropin Syndrome: Clinical Features, Diagnosis, Management, and Long-Term Follow-Up. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2005-1542

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.