Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Risk of Fracture in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study

Bonds, Denise E., Larson, Joseph C., Schwartz, Ann V., Strotmeyer, Elsa S., Robbins, John, Rodriguez, Beatriz L., Johnson, Karen C., Margolis, Karen L.·2006·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: Some but not all studies have shown higher rates of fracture in individuals with type 2 diabetes. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to determine the risk of fracture in postmenopausal women with type 2 diabetes and determine whether risk varies by fracture site, ethnicity, and baseline bone density. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Women with clinically diagnosed type 2 diabetes at baseline in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Cohort, a prospective study of postmenopausal women (n = 93,676), were compared with women without diagnosed diabetes and risk of fracture overall and at specific sites determined. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All fractures and specific sites separately (hip/pelvis/upper leg; lower leg/ankle/knee; foot; upper arm/shoulder/elbow; lower arm/wrist/hand; spine/tailbone) were measured. Bone mineral density (BMD) in a subset also was measured. RESULTS: The overall risk of fracture after 7 yr of follow-up was higher in women with diabetes at baseline after controlling for multiple risk factors including frequency of falls [adjusted relative risk (RR) 1.20, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.11-1.30]. In a subsample of women with baseline BMD scores, women with diabetes had greater hip and spine BMD. The elevated fracture risk was found at multiple sites (hip/pelvis/upper leg; foot; spine/tailbone) among black women (RR 1.33, 95% CI 1.00-1.75) and women with increased baseline bone density (RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96-1.66). CONCLUSION: Women with type 2 diabetes are at increased risk for fractures. This risk is also seen among black and non-Hispanic white women after adjustment for multiple risk factors including frequent falls and increased BMD (in a subset).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2006-0614

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Bonds, D. E., Larson, J. C., Schwartz, A. V., Strotmeyer, E. S., Robbins, J., Rodriguez, B. L., Johnson, K. C., & Margolis, K. L.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2006-09
Volume
91
Issue
9
Pages
3404-3410
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1983484286
Cited by
611
References
0
FWCI
14.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Risk of Fracture in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2006-0614
The paper
Bonds, D. E., Larson, J. C., Schwartz, A. V., Strotmeyer, E. S., Robbins, J., Rodriguez, B. L., Johnson, K. C., & Margolis, K. L. (2006). Risk of Fracture in Women with Type 2 Diabetes: the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2006-0614

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.