The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Granulosa Cell Production of Anti-Müllerian Hormone Is Increased in Polycystic Ovaries
Abstract
CONTEXT: There has been renewed interest in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) because of its role in the ovary. Data on its actions are sparse, but it appears to inhibit follicle growth. Interestingly, serum AMH is two to three times higher in women with polycystic ovary (PCO) syndrome than women with normal ovaries. OBJECTIVE: We examined the production of AMH by cells from a range of follicle sizes from normal ovaries and compared this with production by ovulatory and anovulatory (anov) PCOs. DESIGN: Granulosa cells (GCs) and theca and follicular fluid (ff) were isolated from intact follicles. Cells were cultured for 48 h +/- FSH or LH, and AMH was measured in ff and cell-conditioned media (CM). RESULTS: AMH levels in ff and GC-CM ranged from 42 to 2240 and 0.025 to 1.7 ng/ml, respectively, and were low or undetectable in ff and GC-CM from follicles greater than 9 mm, luteinized cells, and theca and stroma. The mean level of AMH was four times higher in GC-CM from ovulatory PCOs [mean (range) 1.56 (0.025-7)] and 75 times higher from anovPCO [21.4 (17.2-43 ng/ml)] than normal ovaries [0.37 (0.025-1.7)]. Neither LH nor FSH had an effect on AMH production by GCs from normal ovaries, but in cells from PCOs, FSH significantly decreased AMH, and in contrast, LH increased AMH. CONCLUSIONS: The reduction of AMH in follicles greater than 9 mm from normal ovaries appears to be an important requirement for the selection of the dominant follicle. AMH production per GC was 75 times higher in anovPCOs, compared with normal ovaries. This increase in AMH may contribute to failure of follicle growth and ovulation seen in polycystic ovary syndrome.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Franks, S. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199509283331307 · Cited by 2,463
Cited by
The Diagnosis of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome during Adolescence
Witchel, S. F., Oberfield, S., Rosenfield, R. L., Codner, E., Bonny, A., Ibáñez, L., Pena, A., Horikawa, R., Gomez-Lobo, V., Joel, D., et al. (2015) · Hormone Research in Paediatrics · doi:10.1159/000375530 · Cited by 3,113
Azziz, R., Carmina, E., Chen, Z., Dunaif, A., Laven, J. S. E., Legro, R. S., Lizneva, D., Natterson-Horowtiz, B., Teede, H. J., & Yildiz, B. O. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.57 · Cited by 2,005
Rosenfield, R. L., & Ehrmann, D. A. (2016) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1104 · Cited by 1,603
Polycystic ovary syndrome: etiology, pathogenesis and diagnosis
Goodarzi, M. O., Dumesic, D. A., Chazenbalk, G., & Azziz, R. (2011) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2010.217 · Cited by 1,488
Dumesic, D. A., Oberfield, S. E., Stener-Victorin, E., Marshall, J. C., Laven, J. S., & Legro, R. S. (2015) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1018 · Cited by 1,020
Metadata
- Authors
- Pellatt, L., Hanna, L., Brincat, M., Galea, R., Brain, H., Whitehead, S., & Mason, H.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 240-245
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1997386473
- Cited by
- 521
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.