Cited by 1,020Ovarian function and disordersGenetic and Kidney Cyst DiseasesReproductive Biology and Fertility

Scientific Statement on the Diagnostic Criteria, Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, and Molecular Genetics of Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

Open access
Dumesic, Daniel A., Oberfield, Sharon E., Stener-Victorin, Elisabet, Marshall, John C., Laven, Joop S., Legro, Richard S.·2015·Endocrine Reviews

Abstract

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a heterogeneous and complex disorder that has both adverse reproductive and metabolic implications for affected women. However, there is generally poor understanding of its etiology. Varying expert-based diagnostic criteria utilize some combination of oligo-ovulation, hyperandrogenism, and the presence of polycystic ovaries. Criteria that require hyperandrogenism tend to identify a more severe reproductive and metabolic phenotype. The phenotype can vary by race and ethnicity, is difficult to define in the perimenarchal and perimenopausal period, and is exacerbated by obesity. The pathophysiology involves abnormal gonadotropin secretion from a reduced hypothalamic feedback response to circulating sex steroids, altered ovarian morphology and functional changes, and disordered insulin action in a variety of target tissues. PCOS clusters in families and both female and male relatives can show stigmata of the syndrome, including metabolic abnormalities. Genome-wide association studies have identified a number of candidate regions, although their role in contributing to PCOS is still largely unknown.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/er.2015-1018

Cites

462 of 462 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

2 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

10 of the 472 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Zawadzki J, Dunaif A. Diagnostic criteria for polycystic ovary syndrome: towards a rational approach. In: Dunaif A, Givens HR, Haseltine FP, Merriam GR, ed. Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. Boston, MA: Blackwell Scientific; 1992: 377-384.
  2. NIH Office of Disease Prevention. Evidence-based Meth- odology Workshop on Polycystic Ovary Syndrome. 2012 Expert Panel Guidelines on PCOS. https://prevention.nih. gov/docs/programs/pcos/FinalReport.pdf. Accessed De- cember 3-5, 2012.
  3. Ibáñez L, Dimartino-Nardi J, Potau N, Saenger P. Prema- ture adrenarche-normal variant or forerunner of adult dis- ease? Endocr Rev. 2000;21(6):671-696.
  4. Polotsky AJ, Allshouse AA, Crawford SL, et al. Hyperan- drogenic oligomenorrhea and metabolic risks across meno- pausal transition. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(6): 2120 -2127.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumesic, D. A., Oberfield, S. E., Stener-Victorin, E., Marshall, J. C., Laven, J. S., & Legro, R. S.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Morgan Stanley Children's Hospital (US)
  • Department of Physiology (E.S.-V.), Karolinska Institutet, 171 77 Stockholm, Sweden;
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Endocrine Reviews
Published
2015-10-01
Volume
36
Issue
5
Pages
487-525
ISSN
  • 0163-769X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7189
OpenAlex
W2113329249
Cited by
1,020
References
472
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 108 · 2024: 129 · 2023: 126 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 124 · 2020: 91 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 51 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Endocrine Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Pennsylvania State University
  • Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF15OC0015902)
  • National Institutes of Health (28934, U54-HD28-934)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P50HD071836, U54HD028934, U54HD034449, U10HD038992, P50HD028934, 2 U10 HD 38992, R01HD056510, U54-HD-28934)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
Keywords
polycystic ovary syndrome, diagnostic criteria, epidemiology, pathophysiology, molecular genetics, hyperandrogenism, oligoovulation, insulin resistance, gonadotropin secretion, hypothalamic-pituitary feedback, obesity, reproductive phenotypes, metabolic phenotypes, familial aggregation, genome-wide association study, sex steroids
MeSH terms
Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Polycystic Ovary Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review