Cited by 18Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsNeuroendocrine Tumor Research AdvancesPancreatic function and diabetes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hypoglycemia due to Paraneoplastic Secretion of Insulin-Like Growth Factor-I

Daughaday, William H.·2007·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Nonislet cell tumor hypoglycemia (NICTH) resulting from the hypersecretion of IGF-II by a number of different types of mesenchymal tumors has been reported by numerous authors (1). This issue of JCEM contains the first report of a woman with recurrent hypoglycemia resulting from the hypersecretion of IGF-I by an undifferentiated lung carcinoma (2). RIA of this patient’s serum demonstrated only a modest increase in total IGF-I but a 10-fold increase in free IGF-I. Measurements of free and total IGF-II were normal. After filtration through a sizing gel, the IGF-I present in the patient’s serum eluted in the position similar to the IGF-I present in normal serum. Hypoglycemic symptoms were controlled first by treatment with corticosteroids and GH and subsequently by chemotherapy of her tumor. The uniform molecular size of IGF-I observed in this patient’s serum differs remarkably with the heterogeneity of IGF-II-related peptides in the sera of patients with NICTH with large mesenchymal tumors (3). Most of these peptides in the serum of these patients retain the first 21 amino acids of the E domain of pro-IGF-II. Normally, this E-21 of pro-IGF-II is glycosylated (4). This may be a targeting signal for subsequent cleavage of the 21-amino-acid E domain peptide. Therefore, deficient glycosylation of IGF-II E may contribute to the size heterogeneity observed in IGF-II associated with NICTH. We found that big IGF-II of serum of four patients with NICTH were not retained on a Jaclin column, suggesting defective glycosylation (5). We suggested that this failure of glycosylation may have contributed to defective processing of pro-IGF-II. A comparable defect in processing of pro-IGF-I does not appear to occur with tumor-related pro-IGF-I. The E-21 fragment derived from pro-IGF-II appears to be cleared from the plasma very slowly. Much is excreted in the urine and is retained in the serum in uremia. The proper test for a physician to order when faced with a hypoglycemic patient with a tumor and normal concentration of serum insulin is not total serum IGF-I or -II but the free IGF peptide. In the serum of this patient, serum IGF-I was measured by the method of Frystyk et al. (6), which is the gold standard with which others are compared. It involves ultracentrifugal sedimentation of the IGF binding protein complexes under carefully controlled conditions of temperature with subsequent sampling of the supernatant. It is possible to obtain comparable separation of free IGF from bound IGF of serum by precipitation in neutral 80% ethanol and centrifugation in a simpler desktop high-speed centrifuge (7). Fortunately for physicians, several commercial laboratories are now able to measure free IGF-I and free IGF-II in serum. Interpretation of results so obtained requires knowledge of the method used and results in normal sera. With these resources available, it is reasonable to predict that additional cases of tumor-related hypoglycemia due to IGF-I will be recognized. nonislet cell tumor hypoglycemia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2007-0378

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Daughaday, W. H.
Affiliations
University of California, Irvine (US)
Corresponding author
Daughaday, William H.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2007-05
Volume
92
Issue
5
Pages
1616-1616
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1994383116
Cited by
18
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Neuroendocrine Tumor Research Advances
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Pancreatic function and diabetes
Keywords
paraneoplastic hypoglycemia, insulin-like growth factor I, insulin-like growth factor II, free IGF-I, corticosteroid therapy, growth hormone therapy, cancer chemotherapy, mesenchymal tumors
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Insulin-Like Growth Factor I, Insulin-Like Growth Factor II, Lung Neoplasms, Molecular Weight, Paraneoplastic Endocrine Syndromes, Carcinoma, Large Cell

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review