The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Ultrasound Criteria of Malignancy for Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients Followed Up for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer
Abstract
CONTEXT: Neck ultrasonography (US) has become a keystone in the follow-up of patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine specificity and sensitivity of ultrasound criteria of malignancy for cervical lymph nodes (LNs) in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer. DESIGN: We prospectively studied 19 patients referred to the Institut Gustave Roussy for neck LN dissection. All patients underwent a neck US within 4 d prior to surgery. Only LNs that were unequivocally matched between US and pathology were taken into account for the analysis. RESULTS: One hundred three LNs were detected on US, 578 LNs were surgically removed, and 56 LNs were analyzed (28 benign and 28 malignant). Sensitivity and specificity were 68 and 75% for the long axis (> or =1 cm), 61 and 96% for the short axis (>5 mm), 46 and 64% for the round shape (long to short axis ratio < 2), 100 and 29% for the loss of fatty hyperechoic hilum, 39 and 18% for hypoechogenicity, 11 and 100% for cystic appearance, 46 and 100% for hyperechoic punctuations, and 86 and 82% for peripheral vascularization. CONCLUSION: Cystic appearance, hyperechoic punctuations, loss of hilum, and peripheral vascularization can be considered as major ultrasound criteria of LN malignancy. LNs with cystic appearance or hyperechoic punctuations are highly suspicious of malignancy. LNs with a hyperechoic hilum should be considered as benign. Peripheral vascularization has the best sensitivity-specificity compromise. Round shape, hypoechogenicity, and the loss of hilum taken as single criteria are not specific enough to suspect malignancy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Self-citationCooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Self-citationRingel, M. D., Sosa, J. A., Baloch, Z., Bischoff, L., Bloom, G., Brent, G. A., Brock, P. L., Chou, R., Flavell, R. R., Goldner, W., et al. (2025) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1177/10507256251363120 · Cited by 710
Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Time Course of Recurrences During Postsurgery Surveillance
Durante, C., Montesano, T., Torlontano, M., Attard, M., Monzani, F., Tumino, S., Costante, G., Meringolo, D., Bruno, R., Trulli, F., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2012-3401 · Cited by 310
Ha, E. J., Chung, S. R., Na, D. G., Ahn, H. S., Chung, J., Lee, J. Y., Park, J. S., Yoo, R.-E., Baek, J. H., Baek, S. M., et al. (2021) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2021.0713 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Leboulleux, S., Girard, E., Rose, M., Travagli, J. P., Sabbah, N., Caillou, B., Hartl, D. M., Lassau, N., Baudin, E., & Schlumberger, M.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2007-09-01
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 3590-3594
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2118702900
- Cited by
- 539
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Ultrasound Criteria of Malignancy for Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients Followed Up for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2007-0444
- The paper
- Leboulleux, S., Girard, E., Rose, M., Travagli, J. P., Sabbah, N., Caillou, B., Hartl, D. M., Lassau, N., Baudin, E., & Schlumberger, M. (2007). Ultrasound Criteria of Malignancy for Cervical Lymph Nodes in Patients Followed Up for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2007-0444
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.