The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Molecular Testing for Mutations in Improving the Fine-Needle Aspiration Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules
Abstract
CONTEXT: Thyroid nodules are common in adults, but only a small fraction of them are malignant. Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with cytological evaluation is the most reliable tool for cancer diagnosis in thyroid nodules. However, 10-40% of nodules are diagnosed as indeterminate by cytology, making it difficult to optimally manage these patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the feasibility and role of testing for tumor-specific mutations in improving the FNA diagnosis of thyroid nodules. DESIGN: The prospective study included 470 FNA samples of thyroid nodules from 328 patients. At the time of aspiration, a small portion of the material was collected and tested for BRAF, RAS, RET/PTC, and PAX8/PPARgamma mutations. The mutational status was correlated with cytology and either surgical pathology diagnosis or follow-up (mean, 34 months). RESULTS: A sufficient amount of nucleic acids were isolated in 98% of samples. Thirty-two mutations were found, including 18 BRAF, eight RAS, five RET/PTC, and one PAX8/PPARgamma. The presence of any mutation was a strong indicator of cancer because 31 (97%) of mutation-positive nodules had a malignant diagnosis after surgery. A combination of cytology and molecular testing showed significant improvement in the diagnostic accuracy and allowed better prediction of malignancy in the nodules with indeterminate cytology. CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that molecular testing of thyroid nodules for a panel of mutations can be effectively performed in a clinical setting. It enhances the accuracy of FNA cytology and is of particular value for thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Haugen, B. R., Alexander, E. K., Bible, K. C., Doherty, G. M., Mandel, S. J., Nikiforov, Y. E., Pacini, F., Randolph, G. W., Sawka, A. M., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2016) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1089/thy.2015.0020 · Cited by 16,535
Self-citationCooper, D. S., Doherty, G. M., Haugen, B. R., Kloos, R. T., Lee, S. L., Mandel, S. J., Mazzaferri, E. L., McIver, B., Pacini, F., Schlumberger, M., et al. (2009) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2009.0110 · Cited by 6,707
Self-citationPreoperative Diagnosis of Benign Thyroid Nodules with Indeterminate Cytology
Alexander, E. K., Kennedy, G. C., Baloch, Z. W., Cibas, E. S., Chudova, D., Diggans, J., Friedman, L., Kloos, R. T., LiVolsi, V. A., Mandel, S. J., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1203208 · Cited by 1,163
Self-citationProgress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer
Xing, M., Haugen, B. R., & Schlumberger, M. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60109-9 · Cited by 573
Self-citationSteward, D. L., Carty, S. E., Sippel, R. S., Yang, S. P., Sosa, J. A., Sipos, J. A., Figge, J. J., Mandel, S., Haugen, B. R., Burman, K. D., et al. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4616 · Cited by 486
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nikiforov, Y. E., Steward, D. L., Robinson-Smith, T. M., Haugen, B. R., Klopper, J. P., Zhu, Z., Fagin, J. A., Falciglia, M., Weber, K., & Nikiforova, M. N.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2009-06-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 2092-2098
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2077811132
- Cited by
- 711
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 44.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Testing for Mutations in Improving the Fine-Needle Aspiration Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2009-0247
- The paper
- Nikiforov, Y. E., Steward, D. L., Robinson-Smith, T. M., Haugen, B. R., Klopper, J. P., Zhu, Z., Fagin, J. A., Falciglia, M., Weber, K., & Nikiforova, M. N. (2009). Molecular Testing for Mutations in Improving the Fine-Needle Aspiration Diagnosis of Thyroid Nodules. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-0247
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.