CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 212Thyroid Disorders and TreatmentsThyroid and Parathyroid SurgeryPharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Putting Propylthiouracil in Perspective

Cooper, David S., Rivkees, Scott A.·2009·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
DOI 10.1210/jc.2009-0850
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The antithyroid drugs propylthiouracil (PTU) and methimazole (MMI) have played central roles in the management of hyperthyroidism for more than 50 yr. Although both drugs effectively control hyperthyroidism, observations over several decades have shown that MMI and its prodrug carbimazole are better than PTU in controlling more severe hyperthyroidism, having higher adherence rates, and causing less toxicity, especially when prescribed in lower doses (1). This has led to the recommendation that MMI should be the first-line drug when antithyroid drug therapy is initiated, either for primary treatment or to prepare a patient for radioiodine or surgery. An exception to this rule has been pregnancy, during which PTU has been preferred because of rare reports of birth defects associated with MMI (2). PTU has also been used in patients who had minor reactions to MMI but, nonetheless, preferred to continue antithyroid drug therapy. PTU may also be preferable in patients with life-threatening thyrotoxicosis because of its additional inhibition of T4 to T3 conversion. It is in this context that continued PTU use as a second-line agent, a first-line agent in pregnancy, and routinely by some practitioners has been reevaluated at two meetings in the last 6 months. The first meeting, which was sponsored by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Development on October 28, 2008, examined PTU safety in children because of accumulating reports of PTU-related liver failure and death in children (3). The second meeting, sponsored by the American Thyroid Association and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) on April 18, 2009, reevaluated the role of PTU during pregnancy, given what is known about PTU-related hepatotoxicity and MMI-related birth defects (4). At both meetings, the world’s literature on PTU hepatotoxicity was reviewed. Representatives from the FDA provided data on current PTU and MMI prescribing practices. Information pertaining to PTU hepatotoxicity from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (AERS) MedWatch Program was examined. Data on hepatic transplantations for PTU-related hepatotoxicity, provided by The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS), were also reviewed. At the second meeting, MMI-related aplasia cutis and more severe teratogenesis were discussed; however, no new information about the frequency or the cause of this problem was presented. At both meetings, mechanisms of drug-related hepatic injury were reviewed, and the role of biochemical monitoring of liver integrity in patients taking drugs known to cause hepatic damage was discussed. A complex and incomplete but, nonetheless, worrisome picture emerged from these meetings. There are 33 published reports of severe PTU-related liver failure in adults and 14 in children (see Supplemental Table 1 and Supplemental Fig. 1, published as supplemental data on The Endocrine Society’s Journals Online web site at http://jcem.endojournals.org). UNOS reported 16 liver transplants in adults and seven in children between 1990 and 2007 due to PTU-induced liver failure (5, 6) (supplemental data). Although MMI can cause liver injury, too, it is typically characterized by serious cholestatic dysfunction rather than hepatocellular inflammation (1). Indeed, over the same 17-yr period when one to three PTU-related liver transplants occurred per year, there were no liver transplants in the United States attributed to MMI toxicity. The FDA AERS databases, which overlap published reports and are subject to underreporting, detail instances of severe liver injury in 22 adults over the past 20 yr, nine of whom died and five who received liver transplants. Over the same period, 12 pediatric patients sustained severe liver injury resulting in three deaths and six liver transplants. The average daily dose of PTU associated with liver failure was approximately 300 mg in both children and adults. Liver failure occurred after 6 to 450 d (median, 120 d) of treatment. In the AERS data, there were also two reports of serious maternal liver injury due to PTU during pregnancy and two reports of liver injury in fetuses whose mothers took PTU. Because the true incidence of severe liver injury among patients taking PTU is unknown, efforts were made at the two meetings to define this figure more precisely. Based on published age-specific annual incidence data for hyperthyroidism (7) and the age distribution of the U.S. population from the 2000 census, it can be calculated that approximately 60,000 adults develop hyperthyroidism each year. Based on data reported at the two meetings, PTU is prescribed to one fourth of patients treated with antithyroid drugs for hyperthyroidism in the United States (8). Approximately 15,000 adults are, therefore, estimated to begin PTU therapy per year. If the frequency of PTU-related severe liver damage is approximately 0.1% in adults, based on available data (9), approximately 15 adults will develop related severe hepatic injury

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2009-0850

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 11 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. 2009 Propylthiouracyl (PTU)-related liver toxicity. April 18, 2009 workshop. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/CDER/meeting/ptu_toxicity.htm
  2. Governale, 2002–2008, SDI Total Patient Tracker

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 212

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, D. S., & Rivkees, S. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Cooper, David S.
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Publisher
The Endocrine Society
Published
2009-06-01
Volume
94
Issue
6
Pages
1881-1882
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
DOI
10.1210/jc.2009-0850
OpenAlex
W2100074717
Cited by
212
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 18
FWCI
16.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Disorders and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
Keywords
propylthiouracil, methimazole, carbimazole, antithyroid drugs, hyperthyroidism, drug-induced liver injury, hepatotoxicity, pregnancy, teratogenicity, drug safety, adverse event reporting, liver transplantation, T4 to T3 conversion, drug monitoring, prescribing patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Hyperthyroidism, Liver Diseases, Male, Methimazole, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Propylthiouracil, Antithyroid Agents, United States, Incidence, Liver Transplantation, Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review