The DOI matches its Crossref record.
RAS Mutations Are the Predominant Molecular Alteration in Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas and Bear Prognostic Impact
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Poorly differentiated carcinomas represent an aggressive group of thyroid tumors with controversial classification placement and poorly understood pathogenesis. Molecular data in this group of tumors are extremely heterogeneous, possibly reflecting different inclusion criteria. Recently homogeneous diagnostic criteria have been proposed by our group (Turin proposal) that need to be complemented by detailed molecular characterization. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to define a comprehensive molecular typing of poorly differentiated thyroid carcinomas classified following homogeneous diagnostic criteria. DESIGN: Sixty-five cases of poorly differentiated carcinoma selected following the Turin proposal have been screened for N-, K-, H-RAS, BRAF, RET/PTC1 and 3, and PAX8/PPARgamma mutations-rearrangements using alternative techniques and in two different laboratories. Molecular data were compared with clinical pathological parameters and survival by univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: RAS mutations in codon 61 were by far the most common genetic alteration in poorly differentiated carcinomas (23% of cases), with all mutation in NRAS except one in the HRAS gene. A single BRAF mutation was found in a poorly differentiated carcinoma with a residual component of a tall cell variant of papillary carcinoma. No KRAS, RET/PTC, or PAX8/PPARgamma genetic alteration was detected. In this series, the presence of RAS mutations was a unique negative prognostic parameter at multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that strictly classified poorly differentiated carcinomas are genetically homogeneous, RAS mutations being the almost exclusive genetic event. Moreover, the detection of RAS mutations might be clinically relevant for the prognostic stratification of these tumors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Lenvatinib versus Placebo in Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer
Schlumberger, M., Tahara, M., Wirth, L. J., Robinson, B., Brose, M. S., Elisei, R., Habra, M. A., Newbold, K., Shah, M. H., Hoff, A. O., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1406470 · Cited by 2,096
Ringel, M. D., Sosa, J. A., Baloch, Z., Bischoff, L., Bloom, G., Brent, G. A., Brock, P. L., Chou, R., Flavell, R. R., Goldner, W., et al. (2025) · Thyroid® · doi:10.1177/10507256251363120 · Cited by 710
Progress in molecular-based management of differentiated thyroid cancer
Xing, M., Haugen, B. R., & Schlumberger, M. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(13)60109-9 · Cited by 573
Genetic Alterations in the Phosphatidylinositol-3 Kinase/Akt Pathway in Thyroid Cancer
Xing, M. (2010) · Thyroid · doi:10.1089/thy.2010.1646 · Cited by 305
Ma, Y., Gu, Y., Zhang, Q., Han, Y., Yu, S., Lu, Z., & Chen, J. (2013) · Molecular Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0650 · Cited by 55
Metadata
- Authors
- Volante, M., Rapa, I., Gandhi, M., Bussolati, G., Giachino, D., Papotti, M., & Nikiforov, Y. E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2009-12-01
- Volume
- 94
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 4735-4741
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2125952853
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: RAS Mutations Are the Predominant Molecular Alteration in Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas and Bear Prognostic Impact. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2009-1233
- The paper
- Volante, M., Rapa, I., Gandhi, M., Bussolati, G., Giachino, D., Papotti, M., & Nikiforov, Y. E. (2009). RAS Mutations Are the Predominant Molecular Alteration in Poorly Differentiated Thyroid Carcinomas and Bear Prognostic Impact. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2009-1233
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.