Cited by 55Protein Degradation and InhibitorsUbiquitin and proteasome pathwaysPancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

Targeted Degradation of KRAS by an Engineered Ubiquitin Ligase Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer Cell Growth In Vitro and In Vivo

Open access
Ma, Yihui, Gu, Yumei, Zhang, Qiang, Han, Yongqing, Yu, Shuangni, Lu, Zhaohui, Chen, Jie·2013·Molecular Cancer Therapeutics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

KRAS is an attractive pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) therapeutic target. E3 ligase is thought to be the component of the ubiquitin conjugation system that is directly responsible for substrate recognition. In this study, an engineered E3 ubiquitin ligase (RC-U) was generated to target the KRAS oncoprotein for ubiquitination and degradation. The engineered E3 ubiquitin ligases (RC-U) were constructed (pRC-U and lentivirus-expressing RC-U). After transfecting the pRC-U plasmid into human pancreatic cancer cells, KRAS expression levels were determined. KRAS expression was also evaluated in cells transfected with pRC-U and treated with MG-132 or cycloheximide. Interactions between RC-U and KRAS as well as whether RC-U could ubiquitinate KRAS were investigated. Extracellular signal–regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2) and phosphorylated ERK 1/2 (pERK1/2) levels were examined in pancreatic cancer cells transfected with pRC-U. The effects of RC-U on pancreatic cancer cell growth were assessed. RC-U decreased KRAS protein levels. After pRC-U transfection, KRAS stability was increased in the presence of MG-132. HEK 293T cells were transfected with a mutant KRAS construct together with pRC-U and incubated with cycloheximide to inhibit new protein synthesis. The exogenous mutant KRAS oncoprotein was degraded more quickly. RC-U can bind KRAS and KRAS can be ubiquitinated by RC-U. pERK1/2 protein levels were decreased. RC-U resulted in reduced cell proliferation in vitro and in vivo. KRAS destruction by RC-U occurred through a ubiquitin-dependent, proteasome-mediated degradation pathway. RC-U inhibited pancreatic cancer cell growth in vitro and in vivo. Mol Cancer Ther; 12(3); 286–94. ©2012 AACR.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1158/1535-7163.mct-12-0650

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other groups have reported fusion bioPROTACs that degraded HER2, MYC and KRAS and demonstrated therapeutically relevant effects in human cancer cell lines and mouse xenograft tumour models overexpressing these POIs.

    “Since then, other groups have reported fusion bioPROTACs that degraded the cancer targets human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), MYC and KRAS and demonstrated therapeutically relevant effects in human cancer cell lines and mouse xenograft tumour models overexpressing these POIs16,17,211,212.”

    From PROTAC targeted protein degraders: the past is prologue (2022) · cites this paper as [16]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ma, Y., Gu, Y., Zhang, Q., Han, Y., Yu, S., Lu, Z., & Chen, J.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
  • Authors' Affiliations: 1Department of Pathology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital; 2National Laboratory of Medical Molecular Biology, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Tsinghua University, Beijing; 3Department of Pathology, Zhengzhou University, Affiliated Hospital 1, Zhengzhou, PR China; and 4Department of Cancer Biology and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Corresponding author
Chen, Jie
Venue
Molecular Cancer Therapeutics
Published
2013-03-01
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
286-294
ISSN
  • 1535-7163 (ISSN-L)
  • 1538-8514
OpenAlex
W2120917886
Cited by
55
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 5
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Cancer Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (30471970)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Keywords
KRAS, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, targeted protein degradation, ubiquitination, proteasomal degradation, ERK1/2 phosphorylation, cell proliferation inhibition, pancreatic cancer treatment
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Transformation, Neoplastic, Humans, Pancreatic Neoplasms, Phosphorylation, Proto-Oncogene Proteins, Recombinant Fusion Proteins, Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras), ras Proteins, Ubiquitin, Ubiquitin-Protein Ligases, Cell Proliferation, Mice, HEK293 Cells, Molecular Targeted Therapy, Proteolysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review