Longitudinal Study of Insulin Resistance and Sex Hormones over the Menstrual Cycle: The BioCycle Study
Open accessAbstract
CONTEXT: Conflicting findings have been reported regarding the effect of menstrual cycle phase and sex hormones on insulin sensitivity. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to determine the pattern of insulin resistance over the menstrual cycle and whether variations in sex hormones explain these patterns. DESIGN: The BioCycle study is a longitudinal study that measured hormones at different phases of the menstrual cycle. Participants had up to eight visits per cycle; each visit was timed using fertility monitors to capture sensitive windows of hormonal changes. SETTING: The study was conducted in the general community of the University at Buffalo (Buffalo, NY). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 257 healthy, premenopausal women (age, 27±8 yr; body mass index, 24±4 kg/m2) participated in the study. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: We measured fasting insulin, glucose, and insulin resistance by the homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). RESULTS: Significant changes in HOMA-IR were observed over the menstrual cycle; from a midfollicular phase level of 1.35, levels rose to 1.59 during the early luteal phase and decreased to 1.55 in the late-luteal phase. HOMA-IR levels primarily reflected changes in insulin and not glucose. After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol (β=0.082; P<0.001) and progesterone (β=0.025; P<0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted β=-0.040; P<0.001) and SHBG (β=-0.085; P<0.001). LH was not associated with HOMA-IR. Further adjustment for BMI weakened the association with SHBG (β=-0.057; P=0.06) but did not affect other associations. CONCLUSION: Insulin exhibited minor menstrual cycle variability. Estradiol and progesterone were positively associated with insulin resistance and should be considered in studies of insulin resistance among premenopausal women.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In the BioCycle longitudinal study of 257 healthy premenopausal women, insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) varied modestly across the menstrual cycle, rising from midfollicular to early luteal phase. Estradiol and progesterone were positively associated with HOMA-IR, while FSH and SHBG were inversely associated; the SHBG association weakened after BMI adjustment.
Key findings
- HOMA-IR changed significantly over the menstrual cycle: midfollicular 1.35, early luteal 1.59, late luteal 1.55; maximum age-adjusted mean differences over the whole cycle were 0.3 U HOMA-IR and 1.4 IU/ml insulin. HOMA-IR primarily reflected changes in insulin, not glucose.
- After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol (β = 0.082; P < 0.001) and progesterone (β = 0.025; P < 0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted β = −0.040; P < 0.001) and SHBG (β = −0.085; P < 0.001); LH was not associated.
- Further adjustment for BMI weakened the SHBG association (β = −0.057; P = 0.06) but did not affect other associations. In model 1, SHBG was inversely associated with insulin (β = −0.73; P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (β = −0.85; P < 0.001). Glucose was negatively associated with estradiol alone.
- An overall significant 6% increase in HOMA-IR levels was observed during cycle 2.
Methods
- Longitudinal BioCycle study recruited 259 healthy premenopausal women (18–44 yr) and followed them for one (n = 9) or two (n = 250) menstrual cycles; 257 were analyzed after excluding two women with outlying insulin. Participants had up to eight visits per cycle timed by fertility monitors to capture menstrual phases.
- Fasting serum insulin, glucose, SHBG, estradiol, progesterone, LH, and FSH were measured; insulin resistance was calculated by HOMA-IR = fasting insulin (U/ml) × fasting glucose (mmol/liter)/22.5.
- Linear mixed models assessed cycle variability; marginal structural models with inverse probability weighting tested associations of each sex hormone/SHBG with insulin and HOMA-IR, adjusted for age, race, sex hormones, and SHBG (model 1), plus BMI (model 2), plus caloric intake and physical activity (model 3).
Limitations
- Stated: no testosterone measurement; HOMA-IR is a surrogate and applies only to the fasting state, not postprandial glucose metabolism; observed variation in insulin resistance was small and may be of minor clinical relevance; pulsatility of LH and progesterone may affect single-day representativeness.
- Stated: the study included healthy, regularly menstruating women without PCOS, pregnancy, or chronic disease, so findings may not apply to women whose insulin resistance is altered by those conditions.
- Evident from text: the observational design cannot establish causality despite marginal structural models; the cohort was young, healthy, and predominantly Caucasian (60%), limiting generalizability to other populations.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 33 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with progesterone (β = 0.025; P < 0.001).
“After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol ( ϭ 0.082; P Ͻ 0.001) and progesterone ( ϭ 0.025; P Ͻ 0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted  ϭ Ϫ0.040; P Ͻ 0.001) and SHBG ( ϭ Ϫ0.085; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was inversely associated with SHBG (β = -0.085; P < 0.001).
“After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol ( ϭ 0.082; P Ͻ 0.001) and progesterone ( ϭ 0.025; P Ͻ 0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted  ϭ Ϫ0.040; P Ͻ 0.001) and SHBG ( ϭ Ϫ0.085; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
HOMA-IR levels primarily reflected changes in insulin and not glucose.
“HOMA-IR levels primarily reflected changes in insulin and not glucose.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Insulin exhibited minor menstrual cycle variability.
“Insulin exhibited minor menstrual cycle variability.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LH was not associated with HOMA-IR.
“LH was not associated with HOMA-IR.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“There was no association between LH and insulin or HOMA-IR.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol (β = 0.082; P < 0.001).
“After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol ( ϭ 0.082; P Ͻ 0.001) and progesterone ( ϭ 0.025; P Ͻ 0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted  ϭ Ϫ0.040; P Ͻ 0.001) and SHBG ( ϭ Ϫ0.085; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was inversely associated with FSH (adjusted β = -0.040; P < 0.001).
“After adjustment for age, race, cycle, and other sex hormones, HOMA-IR was positively associated with estradiol ( ϭ 0.082; P Ͻ 0.001) and progesterone ( ϭ 0.025; P Ͻ 0.001), and inversely associated with FSH (adjusted  ϭ Ϫ0.040; P Ͻ 0.001) and SHBG ( ϭ Ϫ0.085; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
HOMA-IR levels rose from a midfollicular phase level of 1.35 to 1.59 during the early luteal phase and decreased to 1.55 in the late luteal phase.
“Significant changes in HOMA-IR were observed over the menstrual cycle; from a midfollicular phase level of 1.35, levels rose to 1.59 during the early luteal phase and decreased to 1.55 in the late-luteal phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When statistically tested, no significant interaction was found between the association of insulin and estradiol and phase of menstrual cycle.
“Although this may possibly explain our observation, when we statistically tested for whether the association between insulin and estradiol differed by phase of menstrual cycle, no significant interaction was found, suggesting that the association between insulin and estradiol is consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The association with SHBG was attenuated and not significant after adjusting for BMI.
“However, the association with SHBG was attenuated and not significant after adjusting for BMI, suggesting that the association might be mediated by adiposity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The timing of the highest level of insulin resistance did not coincide exactly with levels of both estradiol and progesterone in the late luteal phase.
“That the timing of the highest level of insulin resistance did not coincide exactly with levels of both estradiol and progesterone in the late luteal phase may indicate that the two major sex hormones do not lead to additive effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Phasespecific median levels of sex hormones did not substantially differ by cycle.
“Phasespecific median levels of sex hormones did not substantially differ by cycle (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
No significant interactions were detected between cycle phase and each of the sex hormones and SHBG on their associations with insulin and HOMA-IR.
“We tested for the interaction between cycle phase and each of the sex hormones and SHBG on their associations with insulin and HOMA-IR to determine whether the associations differed depending on the phase of the menstrual cycle.No significant interactions were detected.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Adjustment for other sex hormones, particularly estradiol and progesterone, did not affect the association between insulin and SHBG.
“That adjustment for the other sex hormones and in particular for estradiol and progesterone, which have significant menstrual cycle variation, did not affect the association between insulin and SHBG may indicate that SHBG may have actions independent of the steroidal sex hormones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The study observed small variation in insulin resistance in this cohort of young, healthy women.
“We also observed small variation in insulin resistance in this cohort of young, healthy women, which may be of minor clinical relevance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the setting of the natural menstrual cycle, the BioCycle study found small yet significant variations of insulin and HOMA-IR that correspond, in part, to levels of estradiol and progesterone.
“In conclusion, our study presents, in the setting of the natural menstrual cycle, small yet significant variations of insulin and HOMA-IR that correspond, in part, to levels of estradiol and progesterone.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Additional adjustment in model 3 for mean caloric intake for each cycle and for physical activity did not further change these associations.
“Additional adjustment in model 3 for mean caloric intake for each cycle and for physical activity did not further change these associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In model 2, additional adjustment for BMI resulted in little change in the associations between the sex hormones and insulin or HOMA-IR.
“In model 2, additional adjust-ment for BMI resulted in little change in the associations between the sex hormones and insulin or HOMA-IR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The magnitudes of the variation were small, with maximum age-adjusted mean differences over the whole cycle of 0.3 U of HOMA-IR and 1.4 IU/ml of insulin.
“The magnitudes of the variation were small, with maximum ageadjusted mean differences over the whole cycle of 0.3 U of HOMA-IR and 1.4 IU/ml of insulin (Table 2).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Estradiol and progesterone exhibited positive associations with insulin and insulin resistance.
“Moreover, both estradiol and progesterone exhibited positive associations with insulin and insulin resistance, whereas FSH and SHBG exhibited inverse associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Glucose was negatively associated with estradiol alone.
“Glucose was negatively associated with estradiol alone.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given
Previous studies based on iv glucose measures to examine the effects of menstrual cycle phase on insulin sensitivity were generally small (n < 15).
“Indeed, previous studies based on iv glucose measures to examine the effects of menstrual cycle phase on insulin sensitivity were generally small (n Ͻ 15), and some studies (9 -11, 14) compared only single measurements of hormone levels in each cycle phase (i.e. one follicular vs. one luteal measurement), timed by approximating calendar day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given
The effects of variations in endogenous sex hormones across the menstrual cycle on insulin sensitivity have not been clearly demonstrated.
“Although both oral contraceptive use and menopausal hormone therapy have been found to alter insulin sensitivity (4), the effects of variations in endogenous sex hormones across the menstrual cycle on insulin sensitivity have not been clearly demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Some evidence has suggested that menstrual cycle effects on insulin sensitivity are not trivial because premenopausal women with diabetes have been observed to have higher rates of hyperglycemia during the luteal phase.
“Some evidence has suggested that menstrual cycle effects on insulin sensitivity are not trivial because premenopausal women with diabetes have been observed to have higher rates of hyperglycemia during the luteal phase (5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [5]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Some previous studies compared only single measurements of hormone levels in each cycle phase, timed by approximating calendar day.
“Indeed, previous studies based on iv glucose measures to examine the effects of menstrual cycle phase on insulin sensitivity were generally small (n Ͻ 15), and some studies (9 -11, 14) compared only single measurements of hormone levels in each cycle phase (i.e. one follicular vs. one luteal measurement), timed by approximating calendar day.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Previous studies may have limited statistical power and inadequate sampling of hormone levels to tease apart the association between insulin resistance and changes in endogenous sex hormones and SHBG through the menstrual cycle.
“As such, they may have limited statistical power and inadequate sampling of hormone levels to tease apart the association between insulin resistance and changes in endogenous sex hormones and SHBG through the menstrual cycle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Longitudinal studies have shown that sex hormones and SHBG levels are related to the development of type 2 diabetes.
“Longitudinal studies have also shown that sex hormones and SHBG levels are related to the development of type 2 diabetes (6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [6]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Conflicting findings have been reported from previous studies that evaluated the effects of menstrual cycle phase on insulin sensitivity.
“Conflicting findings have been reported from previous studies that evaluated the effects of menstrual cycle phase on insulin sensitivity (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The study did not measure testosterone.
“However, we did not measure testosterone, whose binding by SHBG has been purported to explain its protective associations on insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes risk (6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
A cross-sectional study among postmenopausal women (ages, 45-65 yr) demonstrated a strong association between insulin resistance and bioavailable estradiol that was independent of BMI and waist circumference.
“A cross-sectional study among postmenopausal women (ages, 45-65 yr) also demonstrated a strong association between insulin resistance and bioavailable estradiol that was independent of BMI and waist circumference (27).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
The BioCycle study's positive associations for estradiol and progesterone with insulin resistance among premenopausal women are inconsistent with studies based on trials of hormone therapy among postmenopausal women.
“Our findings of the positive associations for estradiol and progesterone with insulin resistance among premenopausal women are inconsistent with studies based on trials of hormone therapy (HT) among postmenopausal women (30).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [30]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
All but one of four studies using iv glucose tolerance testing (IVGTT) found a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle.
“All but one (7) of four studies using iv glucose tolerance testing (IVGTT) found a significant decrease in insulin sensitivity during the luteal phase of the menstrual cycle (7,10,11,14).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 4 sources checked- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [10]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [11]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [14]
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
None of the three studies using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp found any significant differences in glucose metabolism.
“None of the three studies using euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp found any significant differences in glucose metabolism (9,15,16).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [9]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [15]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [16]
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
The association between SHBG and insulin/HOMA-IR was greatly reduced after BMI adjustment, suggesting that their associations are predominantly explained by adiposity.
“However, the association between SHBG and insulin/ HOMA-IR was greatly reduced, suggesting that their associations are predominantly explained by adiposity, due to the fact that HOMA-IR was positively and SHBG was negatively associated with BMI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
SHBG may have actions independent of the steroidal sex hormones.
“That adjustment for the other sex hormones and in particular for estradiol and progesterone, which have significant menstrual cycle variation, did not affect the association between insulin and SHBG may indicate that SHBG may have actions independent of the steroidal sex hormones.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The association between insulin and estradiol is consistent across phases of the menstrual cycle.
“Although this may possibly explain our observation, when we statistically tested for whether the association between insulin and estradiol differed by phase of menstrual cycle, no significant interaction was found, suggesting that the association between insulin and estradiol is consistent.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The lack of exact coincidence between highest insulin resistance and estradiol/progesterone levels may indicate that estradiol and progesterone do not lead to additive effects.
“That the timing of the highest level of insulin resistance did not coincide exactly with levels of both estradiol and progesterone in the late luteal phase may indicate that the two major sex hormones do not lead to additive effects.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The association between SHBG and insulin resistance might be mediated by adiposity.
“However, the association with SHBG was attenuated and not significant after adjusting for BMI, suggesting that the association might be mediated by adiposity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given
The changes across the cycle may not be clinically meaningful.
“Although the changes across the cycle may not be clinically meaningful, these findings do suggest that clinical research studies of insulin sensitivity among premenopausal women could be more optimally conducted by timing visits to menstrual cycle phase to reduce the overall variability in measures of insulin sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
The study design included extensive data across two well-characterized menstrual cycles.
“The strengths of our study include the unique study design with extensive data across two well-characterized menstrual cycles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductnone given
The study included normal menstruating women, rather than women whose insulin resistance may have already been altered by other factors such as PCOS or pregnancy.
“The study included normal menstruating women, rather than women whose insulin resistance may have already been altered by other factors such as PCOS or pregnancy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The BioCycle study's findings contradict a study among premenopausal women that observed a positive correlation between insulin sensitivity by IVGTT and luteal phase progesterone levels.
“As for the association between progesterone and insulin, our findings contradict a study among premenopausal women that observed a positive correlation between insulin sensitivity by IVGTT and luteal phase progesterone levels (r ϭ 0.44; P ϭ 0.07) (7).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
- May combine two claims. 25
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 11
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataFurther adjustment for BMI weakened the association with SHBG (β = -0.057; P = 0.06) but did not affect other associations.
“Further adjustment for BMI weakened the association with SHBG ( ϭ Ϫ0.057; P ϭ 0.06) but did not affect other associations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHOMA-IR and insulin change significantly over the menstrual cycle, with levels rising before ovulation and peaking in the luteal phase.
“Significant changes in HOMA-IR were observed over the menstrual cycle; from a midfollicular phase level of 1.35, levels rose to 1.59 during the early luteal phase and decreased to 1.55 in the late-luteal phase.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“Statistically significant menstrual cycle variation was found for HOMA-IR and insulin levels (Fig. 1).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“Our findings demonstrate that insulin and a related measure of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) change over the menstrual cycle, with levels beginning to rise before ovulation and reaching maximum levels during the luteal phase.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § Results · plain
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo significant interaction by BMI was detected (P > 0.05), and results were similar after excluding overweight women.
“No significant interaction by BMI was detected (P Ͼ 0.05), and results were similar after excluding overweight women (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataSHBG was significantly inversely associated with insulin (β = -0.73; P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (β = -0.85; P < 0.001).
“SHBG was significantly inversely associated with insulin ( ϭ Ϫ0.73; P Ͻ 0.001) and HOMA-IR ( ϭ Ϫ0.85; P Ͻ 0.001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe found no interaction with height and the positive association with insulin persisted regardless of height.
“We found no interaction with height and the positive association with insulin persisted regardless of height (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEstradiol and progesterone were positively associated with insulin and HOMA-IR, whereas FSH was negatively associated.
“Estradiol and progesterone were positively associated with insulin and HOMA-IR, whereas FSH was negatively associated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThe patterns of HOMA-IR for cycles 1 and 2 were similar, although an overall significant increase (6%) in levels was observed during cycle 2.
“The patterns of HOMA-IR for cycles 1 and 2 were similar, although an overall significant increase (6%) in levels was observed during cycle 2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWe found a moderate positive association between insulin and estradiol that was consistent regardless of cycle phase.
“We found a moderate positive association between insulin and estradiol that was consistent regardless of cycle phase, which is in line with two larger studies (26,27).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [26]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [27]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataGlucose levels decreased slightly during ovulation and into the early luteal phase but were otherwise relatively constant throughout the cycle.
“Glucose levels decreased slightly during ovulation and into the early luteal phase but were otherwise relatively constant throughout the cycle.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataEstimates remained unchanged in sensitivity analyses, excluding the potential anovulatory cycles or excluding cycles missing the last visit.
“These estimates also remained unchanged in sensitivity analyses, excluding the potential anovulatory cycles or excluding cycles missing the last visit (data not shown).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFSH and SHBG exhibited inverse associations with insulin and insulin resistance.
“Moreover, both estradiol and progesterone exhibited positive associations with insulin and insulin resistance, whereas FSH and SHBG exhibited inverse associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAfter adjusting for cycle, significant differences were found between the luteal and follicular phases of HOMA-IR primarily due to higher insulin levels in the luteal phase that increased after the onset of ovulation.
“After adjusting for cycle in the statistical models, significant differences were found between the luteal and follicular phases of HOMA-IR primarily due to higher insulin levels in the luteal phase that increased after the onset of ovulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataHOMA-IR was positively associated with BMI and SHBG was negatively associated with BMI.
“due to the fact that HOMA-IR was positively and SHBG was negatively associated with BMI.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationOngoing debate has surrounded the role of sex hormones on insulin resistance.
“Ongoing debate has surrounded the role of sex hormones on insulin resistance (2,3).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [2]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [3]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationIntravenous glucose measures by hyperinsulinemic clamp or other intensive techniques have been treated as the 'gold standard' methods for evaluating insulin sensitivity.
“Intravenous glucose measures by hyperinsulinemic clamp (17) or other intensive techniques (18) have been treated as the “gold standard” methods for evaluating insulin sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [17]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [18]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationNinety-four percent of women completed at least seven clinic visits per cycle, indicating high compliance to study protocol.
“Ninety-four percent of women completed at least seven clinic visits per cycle, indicating high compliance to study protocol, with the main reason for fewer visits related to shorter cycle length (20).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe obesity epidemic has increased the prevalence of metabolic disorders among young, premenopausal women.
“T he obesity epidemic has increased the prevalence of metabolic disorders among young, premenopausal women (1), who are more subject to insulin resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationOral contraceptive use and menopausal hormone therapy have been found to alter insulin sensitivity.
“Although both oral contraceptive use and menopausal hormone therapy have been found to alter insulin sensitivity (4), the effects of variations in endogenous sex hormones across the menstrual cycle on insulin sensitivity have not been clearly demonstrated.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4]
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationYoung, premenopausal women are more subject to insulin resistance.
“T he obesity epidemic has increased the prevalence of metabolic disorders among young, premenopausal women (1), who are more subject to insulin resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [1]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataThe analysis took into account the simultaneous effects of other sex hormones on insulin measures.
“We also further took into account the simultaneous effects of other sex hormones on these measures.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenPulsatility in the secretion of LH and progesterone may have influenced the single day representativeness of the study's measures.
“Lastly, the pulsatility in the secretion of sex hormones LH and progesterone may have influenced the single day representativeness of our measures.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA study of premenopausal women in Norway (ages, 25-35 yr) demonstrated a positive association between daily salivary free estradiol and insulin levels, but only among women who were taller than average (>170 cm).
“A study of premenopausal women in Norway (ages, 25-35 yr) demonstrated a positive association between daily salivary free estradiol and insulin levels, but only among women who were taller than average (Ͼ170 cm) (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26]
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationHOMA-IR has previously been shown to be a valid measure of insulin resistance with strong correlations with measures by euglycemic clamp and by IVGTT.
“HOMA-IR has previously been shown to be a valid measure of insulin resistance with strong correlations with measures by euglycemic clamp and by IVGTT (22).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [22]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOur study supports the suggestion that the positive biological association between estradiol and insulin may not be altered by the reduction of estrogen levels related to the occurrence of menopausal transition, but may rather be exacerbated, perhaps, by changes in adiposity after menopause.
“Our study supports this suggestion, that the positive biological association between estradiol and insulin may not be altered by the reduction of estrogen levels related to the occurrence of menopausal transition, but may rather be exacerbated, perhaps, by changes in adiposity after menopause.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductcitationAll measurements were timed to the LH surge using fertility monitors, decreasing the possibility of misclassification of cycle phases.
“Moreover, all measurements were timed to the LH surge of the women's menstrual cycles using fertility monitors, decreasing the possibility of misclassification of cycle phases (20).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [20]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationTwo studies investigated the changes using HOMA-IR as an index for insulin resistance and found no differences across the cycle.
“Two studies investigated the changes using HOMA-IR as an index for insulin resistance and found no differences across the cycle (7,8).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [7]
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8]
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataInterassay coefficients of variation of analytes for three level quality control materials were less than 8% for insulin, less than 10% for SHBG, less than 10% for estradiol, less than 14% for progesterone, less than 4% for LH, and less than 4% for FSH at all levels.
“Interassay coefficients of variation of analytes for three level quality control materials were less than 8% for insulin, less than 10% for SHBG, less than 10% for estradiol, less than 14% for progesterone, less than 4% for LH, and less than 4% for FSH at all levels.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataThe study had multiple measures in each phase of the cycle, including three LH measures around ovulation and three luteal phase progesterone measures at a standardized time of day.
“However, we had multiple measures in each phase of the cycle, including three LH measures around the time of ovulation and three luteal phase measures of progesterone at a standardized time of day (i.e. between 0700 and 0900 h).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningOur results follow what has been found for IVGTT, which may suggest that the variability rests in insulin sensitivity.
“Our results follow what has been found for IVGTT, which may suggest that the variability rests in insulin sensitivity.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenSerum rather than urinary measures of sex hormones were available.
“Serum, rather than urinary, measures of sex hormones were also available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe variation in insulin and HOMA-IR across menstrual cycle was very small and may explain why previous studies of smaller size may not have detected significant change.
“The variation in insulin and HOMA-IR across menstrual cycle was very small and may explain why previous studies of smaller size may not have detected significant change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThese fluctuations across the cycle are most likely explained by the fact that insulin and HOMA-IR were positively associated with estradiol and progesterone, whereas negatively associated with FSH and SHBG.
“These fluctuations across the cycle are most likely explained by the fact that insulin and HOMA-IR were positively associated with estradiol and progesterone, whereas negatively associated with FSH and SHBG.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBMI partially accounted for the association between SHBG and insulin but had no influence on the other associations.
“BMI partially accounted for the association between SHBG and insulin but had no influence on the other associations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationown dataThe small variation in insulin resistance may be of minor clinical relevance.
“We also observed small variation in insulin resistance in this cohort of young, healthy women, which may be of minor clinical relevance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Study design and conductnone givenBioCycle is the largest study to date with repeated measures of insulin and glucose over two menstrual cycles.
“BioCycle is the largest study to date with repeated measures of insulin and glucose over two menstrual cycles.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenThe results can only be applied to the fasting state and cannot speak to postprandial glucose metabolism.
“Nevertheless, these results can only be applied to the fasting state and cannot speak to postprandial glucose metabolism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Peripheral insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle, with relative peripheral insulin resistance occurring in the luteal phase compared to in the follicular phase.
“Peripheral insulin sensitivity changes during the menstrual cycle, with relative peripheral insulin resistance occurring in the luteal phase compared to in the follicular phase29.”
From Brain insulin action on peripheral insulin sensitivity in women depends on menstrual cycle phase (2023) · cites this paper as [29]
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports higher HOMA-IR in the early luteal phase than in the midfollicular phase, supporting a cycle-related change in insulin resistance. But the study measured fasting insulin and glucose, not peripheral insulin sensitivity directly; the Discussion (page unavailable) also notes that clamp studies found no significant difference. The claim's specific assertion of peripheral insulin resistance is therefore not established by this study. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredFluctuations in insulin sensitivity associated with the female menstrual cycle occur due to changes in the balance between estrogen and progesterone.
“Fluctuations in insulin sensitivity associated with the female menstrual cycle occur due to changes in the balance between estrogen and progesterone.”
From A study of changes in insulin requirements related to the menstrual cycle in Japanese women with type 1 diabetes using the advanced hybrid closed‐loop system (2026) · cites this paper as [1]
The Discussion reports that insulin and HOMA-IR fluctuate over the menstrual cycle and says these changes are most likely explained by their associations with estradiol and progesterone. It does not establish that a changing balance between the two hormones causes changes in insulin sensitivity; the study measured insulin resistance using HOMA-IR. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredReduced insulin sensitivity begins around ovulation and peaks during the progesterone-dominant luteal phase.
“Reduced insulin sensitivity is known to begin around ovulation and to peak during the progesterone‐dominant luteal phase 1 , 2 .”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
HOMA-IR-SHBG coefficient differs tenfold from Table 3
MajorThe Results report a HOMA-IR-SHBG coefficient of −0.85, while Table 3 gives −0.085 for model 1.
“HOMA-IR ( ϭ Ϫ0.85; P Ͻ 0.001)”
“Model 1 | 0.082 (0.009) | 0.025 (0.009) | ؊0.085 (0.03) | 0.009 (0.009) | ؊0.040 (0.01)”
Insulin-SHBG coefficient differs tenfold from Table 3
MajorThe Results report an insulin-SHBG coefficient of −0.73, while Table 3 gives −0.073 for model 1.
“SHBG was significantly inversely associated with insulin ( ϭ Ϫ0.73; P Ͻ 0.001)”
“Model 1 | 0.086 (0.009) | 0.025 (0.009) | ؊0.073 (0.03) | 0.011 (0.008) | ؊0.039 (0.01)”
Other-race percentage does not match its count
MinorTable 1 lists 13 of 257 participants as other race. That is 5.1%, not the reported 4%.
Reported 4 · recomputed 5.058366
“Other race Household income, n (%) Less than $19,999 $20,000 -$39,999 $40,000 -$74,999 | 13 (4%) 55 (21%) 61 (24%) 72 (28%)”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 145
- Authors
- Yeung, E. H., Zhang, C., Mumford, S. L., Ye, A., Trevisan, M., Chen, L., Browne, R. W., Wactawski-Wende, J., & Schisterman, E. F.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Nevada, Las Vegas (US)
- University at Buffalo, State University of New York (US)
- Corresponding author
- Schisterman, Enrique F.
- ORCID
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2010-12
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 5435-5442
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- PMC
- PMC2999972
- OpenAlex
- W2018959435
- Semantic Scholar
- dd54971c545ca8bd4dc0bb5b25c9940558a66bf6
- Cited by
- 145
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 8
- FWCI
- 7.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Estrogen and related hormone effects
- Keywords
- insulin resistance, menstrual cycle, sex hormones, estradiol, progesterone, luteal phase, follicular phase, HOMA-IR, premenopausal women, sex hormone-binding globulin, luteinizing hormone, follicle-stimulating hormone, fasting insulin
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Educational Status, Female, Fertility, Follicular Phase, Humans, Income, Insulin, Insulin Resistance, Longitudinal Studies, Luteal Phase, Menstrual Cycle, Menstruation, Body Mass Index, Premenopause, Patient Selection, Racial Groups, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review