Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 274

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Classification of Thyroid Nodules Using High-Dimensionality Genomic Data

Chudova, Darya, Wilde, Jonathan I., Wang, Eric T., Wang, Hui, Rabbee, Nusrat, Egidio, Camila M., Reynolds, Jessica, Tom, Ed, Pagan, Moraima, Rigl, C. Ted, Friedman, Lyssa, Wang, C. Charles, Lanman, Richard B., Zeiger, Martha, Kebebew, Electron, Rosai, Juan, Fellegara, Giovanni, LiVolsi, Virginia A., Kennedy, Giulia C.·2010·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We set out to develop a molecular test that distinguishes benign and malignant thyroid nodules using fine-needle aspirates (FNA). DESIGN: We used mRNA expression analysis to measure more than 247,186 transcripts in 315 thyroid nodules, comprising multiple subtypes. The data set consisted of 178 retrospective surgical tissues and 137 prospectively collected FNA samples. Two classifiers were trained separately on surgical tissues and FNAs. The performance was evaluated using an independent set of 48 prospective FNA samples, which included 50% with indeterminate cytopathology. RESULTS: Performance of the tissue-trained classifier was markedly lower in FNAs than in tissue. Exploratory analysis pointed to differences in cellular heterogeneity between tissues and FNAs as the likely cause. The classifier trained on FNA samples resulted in increased performance, estimated using both 30-fold cross-validation and an independent test set. On the test set, negative predictive value and specificity were estimated to be 96 and 84%, respectively, suggesting clinical utility in the management of patients considering surgery. Using in silico and in vitro mixing experiments, we demonstrated that even in the presence of 80% dilution with benign background, the classifier can correctly recognize malignancy in the majority of FNA samples. CONCLUSIONS: The FNA-trained classifier was able to classify an independent set of FNAs in which substantial RNA degradation had occurred and in the presence of blood. High tolerance to dilution makes the classifier useful in routine clinical settings where sampling error may be a concern. An ongoing multicenter clinical trial will allow us to validate molecular test performance on a larger independent test set of prospectively collected thyroid FNAs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2010-1087

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 274

Metadata

Authors
Chudova, D., Wilde, J. I., Wang, E. T., Wang, H., Rabbee, N., Egidio, C. M., Reynolds, J., Tom, E., Pagan, M., Rigl, C. T., Friedman, L., Wang, C. C., Lanman, R. B., Zeiger, M., Kebebew, E., Rosai, J., Fellegara, G., LiVolsi, V. A., & Kennedy, G. C.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2010-12
Volume
95
Issue
12
Pages
5296-5304
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2037050084
Cited by
274
References
18
FWCI
18.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Classification of Thyroid Nodules Using High-Dimensionality Genomic Data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2010-1087
The paper
Chudova, D., Wilde, J. I., Wang, E. T., Wang, H., Rabbee, N., Egidio, C. M., Reynolds, J., Tom, E., Pagan, M., Rigl, C. T., Friedman, L., Wang, C. C., Lanman, R. B., Zeiger, M., Kebebew, E., Rosai, J., Fellegara, G., LiVolsi, V. A., & Kennedy, G. C. (2010). Molecular Classification of Thyroid Nodules Using High-Dimensionality Genomic Data. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2010-1087

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.