Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 718

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation

Yassa, Leila, Cibas, Edmund S., Benson, Carol B., Frates, Mary C., Doubilet, Peter M., Gawande, Atul A., Moore, Francis D., Kim, Brian W., Nosé, Vânia, Marqusee, Ellen, Larsen, P. Reed, Alexander, Erik K.·2007·Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic evaluation of patients with thyroid nodules is imprecise. Despite the benefits of fine-needle aspiration (FNA), most patients who are referred for surgery because of abnormal cytology prove to have benign disease. Recent technologic and procedural advances suggest that this shortcoming can be mitigated, although few data confirm this benefit in unselected patients. METHODS: A total of 2587 sequential patients were evaluated by thyroid ultrasound and were offered ultrasound-guided FNA (UG-FNA) of all thyroid nodules that measured > or =1 cm during a 10-year period. Results of aspiration cytology were correlated with histologic findings. The prevalence of thyroid cancer in all patients and in those who underwent surgery was determined. Surgical risk was calculated. RESULTS: Tumors that measured > or =1 cm were present in 14% of patients: Forty-three percent of patients had tumors that measured <2 cm in greatest dimension, and 93% had American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I or II disease. The cytologic diagnoses 'positive for malignancy' and 'no malignant cells' were 97% predictive and 99.7% predictive, respectively. Repeat FNA of initial insufficient aspirates, as well as more detailed classification of inconclusive aspirates, improved preoperative assessment of cancer risk and reduced surgical intervention. Fifty-six percent of patients who were referred for surgery because of abnormal cytology had cancer compared with from 10% to 45% of patients historically. An analysis of operative complications from a subset of 296 patients demonstrated a 1% risk of permanent surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings demonstrated the benefits of UG-FNA and of a more detailed classification of inconclusive aspirates in the preoperative risk assessment of thyroid nodules, supporting adherence to recently published guidelines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/cncr.23116

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 718

Metadata

Authors
Yassa, L., Cibas, E. S., Benson, C. B., Frates, M. C., Doubilet, P. M., Gawande, A. A., Moore, F. D., Kim, B. W., Nosé, V., Marqusee, E., Larsen, P. R., & Alexander, E. K.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-11-12
Volume
111
Issue
6
Pages
508-516
ISSN
0008-543X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077923955
Cited by
718
References
28
FWCI
13.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/cncr.23116
The paper
Yassa, L., Cibas, E. S., Benson, C. B., Frates, M. C., Doubilet, P. M., Gawande, A. A., Moore, F. D., Kim, B. W., Nosé, V., Marqusee, E., Larsen, P. R., & Alexander, E. K. (2007). Long-term assessment of a multidisciplinary approach to thyroid nodule diagnostic evaluation. Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.23116

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.