Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 275

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

BRAF V600E mutation and Its Association with Clinicopathological Features of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Li, Carol, Lee, Kathleen C., Schneider, Eric B., Zeiger, Martha A.·2012·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting literature regarding the association of the BRAF V600E mutation and aggressive clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer (PTC). Nevertheless, some propose that BRAF status be incorporated into the management of patients with PTC, specifically recommendations regarding lymph node dissection. We therefore performed a meta-analysis to examine the relationship between BRAF and clinicopathological features of PTC. METHODS: A literature search was performed within PubMed and EMBASE databases using the following Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and keywords: "braf," "mutation," "thyroid," "neoplasm(s)," "tumor," "cancer," and "carcinoma." Individual study-specific odds ratios and confidence intervals were calculated, as were Mantel-Haenszel pooled odds ratios for the combined studies. RESULTS: Thirty-two studies including 6372 patients were reviewed. BRAF mutation was associated with lymph node metastases (LNM), advanced stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC. There was no association with age or vascular invasion. Only two studies were prospective; nine included consecutive patients, whereas one included randomly selected patients; and only two included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection and were thus evaluable for the presence of LNM. CONCLUSION: Meta-analysis found that BRAF mutation is associated with LNM, stage, extrathyroidal extension, tumor size, male gender, multifocality, absence of capsule, classic PTC, and tall-cell variant PTC in PTC. However, almost all studies were retrospective and only two of 32 included patients who had undergone routine central lymph node dissection, emphasizing the need for well-designed studies to appropriately examine this association before making important clinical decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2012-2104

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 275

Metadata

Authors
Li, C., Lee, K. C., Schneider, E. B., & Zeiger, M. A.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2012-12-01
Volume
97
Issue
12
Pages
4559-4570
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2025370928
Cited by
275
References
35
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: BRAF V600E mutation and Its Association with Clinicopathological Features of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.2012-2104
The paper
Li, C., Lee, K. C., Schneider, E. B., & Zeiger, M. A. (2012). BRAF V600E mutation and Its Association with Clinicopathological Features of Papillary Thyroid Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2012-2104

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.