Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 310

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Papillary Thyroid Cancer: Time Course of Recurrences During Postsurgery Surveillance

Open access
Durante, Cosimo, Montesano, Teresa, Torlontano, Massimo, Attard, Marco, Monzani, Fabio, Tumino, Salvatore, Costante, Giuseppe, Meringolo, Domenico, Bruno, Rocco, Trulli, Fabiana, Massa, Michela, Maniglia, Adele, D'Apollo, Rosaria, Giacomelli, Laura, Ronga, Giuseppe, Filetti, Sebastiano·2013·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

CONTEXT: The current use of life-long follow-up in patients with papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) is based largely on the study of individuals diagnosed and treated in the latter half of the 20th century when recurrence rates were approximately 20% and relapses detected up to 20-30 years after surgery. Since then, however, diagnosis, treatment, and postoperative monitoring of PTC patients have evolved significantly. OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to identify times to PTC recurrence and rates by which these relapses occurred in a more recent patient cohort. PATIENTS AND DESIGN: We retrospectively analyzed follow-up data for 1020 PTC patients consecutively diagnosed in 1990-2008 in 8 Italian hospital centers for thyroid disease. Patients underwent thyroidectomy, with or without radioiodine ablation of residual thyroid tissue and were followed up with periodic serum thyroglobulin assays and neck sonography. RESULTS: At the initial posttreatment (≤ 12 months) examination, 948 patients had no structural/functional evidence of disease. During follow-up (5.1-20.4 years; median 10.4 years), recurrence (cervical lymph nodes, thyroid bed) was diagnosed in 13 (1.4%) of these patients. All relapses occurred 8 or fewer years after treatment (10 within the first 5 years, 6 within the first 3 years). Recurrence was unrelated to the use/omission of postoperative radioiodine ablation. CONCLUSION: In PTC patients whose initial treatment produces disease remission (no structural evidence of disease), recurrent disease is rare, and it usually occurs during the early postoperative period. The picture of recurrence timing during the follow-up provides a foundation for the design of more cost-effective surveillance protocols for PTC patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2012-3401

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 310

Metadata

Authors
Durante, C., Montesano, T., Torlontano, M., Attard, M., Monzani, F., Tumino, S., Costante, G., Meringolo, D., Bruno, R., Trulli, F., Massa, M., Maniglia, A., D'Apollo, R., Giacomelli, L., Ronga, G., & Filetti, S.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2013-02
Volume
98
Issue
2
Pages
636-642
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1999758442
Cited by
310
References
1
FWCI
16.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.