Cited by 8Gastrointestinal motility and disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and Management

Gastric Emptying Impacts the Timing of Meal Glucose Peak in Subjects With Uncomplicated Type 1 Diabetes

Open access
Lupoli, Roberta, Creanza, Annalisa, Griffo, Ettore, Nardone, Gerardo, Rocco, Alba, Bozzetto, Lutgarda, Annuzzi, Giovanni, Riccardi, Gabriele +1 more·2018·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Context: Diabetes mellitus is associated with gastrointestinal (GI) motility dysfunction, ranging from delayed to accelerated gastric emptying (GE). Objective: To evaluate GE in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) without chronic complications and to investigate its relation with postprandial glucose and GI hormone responses. Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting/Participants: Forty-two patients with T1DM free of chronic complications referred to Federico II University and 31 healthy controls similar for age, sex, and body mass index. Interventions/Main Outcome Measures: GE was assessed by using the 13C-octanoate breath test with a standardized solid meal. During the meal, plasma glucose, ghrelin, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) responses were assessed, and GI symptoms were evaluated by a specific questionnaire. Results: Patients with T1DM showed a significantly slower GE half-emptying time (GE t1/2) (113 ± 34 minutes) than did controls (89 ± 17 minutes; P < 0.001). Thirty-six percent of T1DM showed a delayed GE (t1/2 > 120 minutes), whereas all controls showed a normal GE. When patients with T1DM were stratified according to GE t1/2, postmeal glucose response was significantly different between those with delayed and those with normal GE (P = 0.013). In particular, patients with T1DM and delayed GE showed a significantly longer mean time to peak glucose than did patients with normal GE (P = 0.004). In addition, GE t1/2 was an independent predictor of the time to peak glucose (β = 0.329; P = 0.025). GLP-1 and ghrelin responses to the test meal, as well as the prevalence of GI symptoms, were similar between patients with T1DM and controls and between patients with T1DM with normal GE and those with delayed GE. Conclusions: Delayed GE time is associated with a longer time to peak glucose. GE evaluation could be useful for individualizing the timing of preprandial insulin bolus in patients with T1DM.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.2017-02811

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In DGP, gastric emptying becomes both delayed and erratic; the timing of nutrient arrival in the small intestine may be hours after food intake and highly variable between meals.

    “In DGP, gastric emptying becomes both delayed and erratic; as a consequence, the timing of nutrient arrival in the small intestine may be hours after food intake and highly variable between meals [91].”

    From Diabetic gastroparesis: pathophysiology and impact on insulin timing choices (2026) · cites this paper as [91]

    The Discussion (page not specified) links delayed gastric emptying to slower delivery of carbohydrates to the small intestine and a later postmeal glucose peak. It does not establish that gastric emptying in diabetic gastroparesis is erratic, that nutrient arrival occurs hours after eating, or that its timing varies substantially between meals. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lupoli, R., Creanza, A., Griffo, E., Nardone, G., Rocco, A., Bozzetto, L., Annuzzi, G., Riccardi, G., & Capaldo, B.
Affiliations
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Corresponding author
Capaldo, Brunella
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
2018-04-11
Volume
103
Issue
6
Pages
2269-2276
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2807099121
Cited by
8
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, gastric emptying, delayed gastric emptying, postprandial blood glucose, 13C-octanoate breath test, ghrelin, glucagon-like peptide-1, gastrointestinal hormones, gastrointestinal symptoms, gastrointestinal motility
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Gastric Emptying, Humans, Insulin, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Postprandial Period, Glucagon-Like Peptide 1, Ghrelin, Young Adult, Meals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review