Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 256

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on metabolic indices, body composition, and bone turnover in healthy elderly women

Holloway, L.·1994·Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

We conducted a controlled trial of recombinant human GH (rhGH) in 27 healthy elderly women (66.7 +/- 3.0 yr), of whom 8 took a stable dose of replacement estrogen throughout the study (plus estrogen group). Hormone or placebo was given as a single daily injection. A total of 19 women were assigned to receive rhGH at an initial daily dose of 0.043 mg/kg BW. After several weeks, 50% dose reductions were necessitated by side-effects. The last 7 subjects to be enrolled began treatment at this reduced level. A total of 13 women assigned to rhGH and 14 women assigned to placebo completed 6 months of drug treatment. In the rhGH group, 6 women took estrogen; thus, the effects of rhGH were assessed separately by estrogen status. Circulating insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels were similar at baseline (rhGH, 133 +/- 40.4 micrograms/L; placebo, 128 +/- 13). rhGH increased IGF-I and IGF-I-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) in all subjects [6 month IGF-I in plus estrogen women, 230 +/- 25.4 micrograms/L; in those not receiving estrogen (minus estrogen), 308 +/- 21.3]. No changes in IGF-I or IGFBP-3 occurred with placebo (IGF-I, 144 +/- 21.3 micrograms/L). Skinfold thickness measurements showed an 11% decrease in fat mass (P < 0.005) and a 9% decrease in percent fat after 6 months of rhGH treatment. No significant difference in nitrogen balance was seen in either group at 6 months, but rhGH increased creatinine clearance by 9.2% (P < 0.05). rhGH dramatically increased markers of bone turnover, with more pronounced effects in minus estrogen women. Hydroxyproline excretion increased by 20% and 80%, and pyridinoline excretion increased by 44% and 75% in plus and minus estrogen subgroups, respectively. Osteocalcin concentrations increased by more than 60% in minus estrogen women (P < 0.05), but did not change in the plus estrogen group. No changes were observed in circulating type I procollagen extension peptide in either group, and no change in any turnover marker was seen in the placebo group. rhGH did not alter blood pressure or circulating L-T4 levels, but a transient increase in serum T3 was observed in the minus estrogen group at 3 months. rhGH decreased low density lipoprotein cholesterol in the minus estrogen group, but otherwise no significant changes in circulating lipoproteins or fibrinogen were observed. Eight women assigned to rhGH and 14 placebo-treated women remained on blinded treatment through 12 months.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.79.2.470

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 256

Metadata

Authors
Holloway, L.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1994-08-01
Volume
79
Issue
2
Pages
470-479
ISSN
0021-972X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165675667
Cited by
256
References
4
FWCI
15.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on metabolic indices, body composition, and bone turnover in healthy elderly women. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jc.79.2.470
The paper
Holloway, L. (1994). Effects of recombinant human growth hormone on metabolic indices, body composition, and bone turnover in healthy elderly women. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.79.2.470

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.