Cited by 22Heart Failure Treatment and ManagementHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlCardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research

Atrial natriuretic factor and digoxin-like immunoreactive factor in diabetic patients: their interrelation and the influence of the autonomic nervous system

Straub, R. H.·1996·Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

In diabetic patients, several factors contribute to volume expansion and have to be counteracted by humoral and neuronal feedback control systems. We investigated N-terminal proatrial natriuretic factor (ANF1-98) and digoxin-like immunoreactive factor (DLIF), which are two counteracting hormones, and their interrelationship, with additional consideration given to autonomic nervous function in diabetic patients. ANF1-98 and DLIF were measured in 64 diabetic patients. Autonomic nervous function was assessed using nine autonomic nervous function tests. The patients were subdivided into two groups, one with four or more (group 1) and one with less than four abnormal results in autonomic function tests (group 2). Compared with group 2, group 1 demonstrated detectable DLIF levels less often (17.2 vs. 45.7, P = 0.0195) and increased levels of ANF1-98 (mean +/- SEM: 850.0 +/- 108.8 vs. 554.8 +/- 45.9 pmol/L, P = 0.0099). However, the groups did not differ in blood pressure, daily sodium, and daily potassium excretion. The number of abnormal autonomic function tests correlated significantly with ANF1-98 (P = 0.0002). In patients with detectable DLIF, DLIF correlated with ANF1-98 (P = 0.0080). These results demonstrate close interactions between the autonomic nervous system and the two natriuretic hormones. In patients with autonomic nervous dysfunction, higher levels of ANF may possibly compensate for the lack of the natriuretic DLIF to counteract hypertension and chronic volume expansion.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jc.81.9.3385

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In chronic inflammatory diseases, serum levels of atrial natriuretic factor and NT-brain natriuretic factor are markedly increased, indicating volume overload.

    “there are obvious signs of volume overload in chronic inflammatory diseases because serum levels of atrial natriuretic factor and NT-brain natriuretic factor are markedly increased in different diseases [49–52].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Straub, R. H.
Affiliations
University Hospital Regensburg (DE)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1996-09-01
Volume
81
Issue
9
Pages
3385-3389
ISSN
0021-972X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036421062
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Cardiovascular, Neuropeptides, and Oxidative Stress Research
Keywords
atrial natriuretic peptide, digoxin-like immunoreactive factor, diabetes mellitus, autonomic dysfunction, natriuretic hormone, volume expansion, hypertension, autonomic function testing, sodium and potassium excretion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Autonomic Nervous System, Cardenolides, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Digoxin, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Atrial Natriuretic Factor, Peptide Fragments, Protein Precursors, Saponins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review