The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Development of Bone Strength at the Proximal Radius during Childhood and Adolescence
Abstract
Current investigations of bone development mostly focus on bone mass, but bone strength may be functionally more important than mass. Therefore, we compared the developmental changes in cortical bone mass (BMCcort) and parameters of cortical bone strength [polar moment of inertia, section modulus, and strength strain index (SSI)]. Analyses were performed at the 65% site of the proximal radius using peripheral quantitative computed tomography. The study population comprised 469 healthy subjects, 6-40 yr of age (273 females). Both in prepubertal children (pubertal stage 1) and after puberty (pubertal stage 5 and adults) all studied parameters were significantly higher in males. During puberty (pubertal stages 2-4) the gender-specific differences were generally somewhat smaller. All of the measured parameters increased significantly with age and pubertal stage. However, although the percent increase in BMCcort between the youngest children and adults was similar between the genders, the increases in polar moment of inertia, section modulus, and SSI were higher in males. The ratio between section modulus and BMCcort was consistently higher in males after the age of 11 yr and after pubertal stage 2. Similar results were found for ratios between polar moment of inertia or SSI and BMCcort. These results show that for a given bone mass, males have stronger bones than females after pubertal stage 2. This reflects the fact that in puberty males add bone mostly on the periosteal surface, where the effect on bone strength is highest, whereas females add bone on the endocortical surface, which has a small effect on bone stability. The purpose of the mechanically inefficient endocortical apposition in female puberty might be to create a reservoir of calcium for future pregnancy and lactation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic biomechanical measurements of bone: A tutorial
Turner, C. H., & Burr, D. B. (1993) · Bone · doi:10.1016/8756-3282(93)90081-k · Cited by 1,666
Cited by
Metabolic diseases and associated complications: sex and gender matter
Kautzky‐Willer, A., & Handisurya, A. (2009) · European Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2362.2009.02161.x · Cited by 138
Forwood, M. R., Baxter-Jones, A. D., Beck, T. J., Mirwald, R. L., Howard, A., & Bailey, D. A. (2006) · Bone · doi:10.1016/j.bone.2005.09.021 · Cited by 86
Metadata
- Authors
- Schoenau, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 2001-02-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 613-618
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1985499197
- Cited by
- 305
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.