The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Hyperprolactinemic Anovulatory Syndrome*
Abstract
The functional status of the hypothalamo-pituitary-gonadal axis was investigated in 127 women with anovulatory disease. Radioimmunoassayable circulating LH, FSH, and prolactin concentrations were measured. An attempt was made to localize the functional lesion by utilizing the following criteria: 1. Hypothalamic function: a) clomiphene test based upon hormonal parameters; b) recording of the pulsatile LH fluctuation (spiking) and of basal FSH. 2. Pituitary function: determination of the gonadotropin reserve by means of a standardized LRH test. 3. Ovarian function: a) measurement of plasma E2 and progesterone levels by RIA; b) gestagen bleeding test. All patients had amenorrhea of up to 14 years duration. A total of 17 hyperprolactinemic patients (13.4%) was found. Eight of these patients never experienced galatorrhea, in 7 only transient galactorrhea was reported, and in 2 cases galactorrhea persisted. All hyperprolactinemic patients were found to be clomiphene non-responders as well as nonspikers. The pituitary LH reserve varied from practically none to normal. Baseline LH was low whereas that of FSH was normal. In accordance with this observation E2 levels, with two exceptions, were found to be in the lower range of normal female concentrations. Thus, all but two patients exhibited gestagen withdrawal bleeding. In conclusion, the hyperprolactinemic anvoluatory syndrome is not necessarily associated with galactorrhea. In all cases of amenorrhea syndromes with or without galactorrhea, hyperprolactinemia should be excluded as it is very often associated with anovulation. The hyperprolactinemic anovulatory syndrome includes the following features: 1. gestagen withdrawal bleeding. 2. subnormal to normal E2 levels. 3. clomiphene nonresponsiveness. 4. LH-hypogonadotropism. 5. lack of LH secretory episodes. 6. FSH-normogonadotropism.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Galactorrhea: A Study of 235 Cases, Including 48 with Pituitary Tumors
Kleinberg, D. L., Noel, G. L., & Frantz, A. G. (1977) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm197703172961103 · Cited by 560
Decreased spinal mineral content in amenorrheic women
Cann, C. E. (1984) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.1984.03340290040017 · Cited by 409
Decreased Bone Density in Hyperprolactinemic Women
Klibanski, A., Neer, R. M., Beitins, I. Z., Ridgway, E. C., Zervas, N. T., & McArthur, J. W. (1980) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198012253032605 · Cited by 360
BÄCKSTRÖM, C. T., McNEILLY, A. S., LEASK, R. M., & BAIRD, D. T. (1982) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1982.tb02631.x · Cited by 344
Grattan, D. R., Jasoni, C. L., Liu, X., Anderson, G. M., & Herbison, A. E. (2007) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2007-0403 · Cited by 145
Metadata
- Authors
- BOHNET, H. G., DAHLÉN, H. G., WUTTKE, W., & SCHNEIDER, H. P. G.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1976-01
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 132-143
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W3023534667
- Cited by
- 263
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hyperprolactinemic Anovulatory Syndrome*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-42-1-132
- The paper
- BOHNET, H. G., DAHLÉN, H. G., WUTTKE, W., & SCHNEIDER, H. P. G. (1976). Hyperprolactinemic Anovulatory Syndrome*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-42-1-132
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.