The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biological Effects of Various Doses of Conjugated Equine Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women*
Abstract
To determine which dosage of estrogen might provide physiological replacement and also avoid possible harmful side effects, 21 postmenopausal women were studied before and after the oral administration of conjugated equine estrogens. The dosages studied were 0.15, 0.30, 0.625, and 1.25 mg/day, with each being given for 6 weeks. Fifteen premenopausal women were also studied, and their values were presumed to reflect normal physiological function. Variable responses of the different biochemical and biological markers of the action of estrogen were observed. Both LH and FSH levels showed stepwise decreases with increasing amounts of estrogen, but even 1.25 mg/day did not suppress these hormones to the range found in premenopausal women, suggesting a subphysiological response. The lower dosages of conjugated estrogen had minimal effects on vaginal cytology, with only the 1.25-mg dose changing the maturation index to values similar to those found in premenopausal subjects. The 0.3-mg dose of conjugated estrogen was the lowest amount that resulted in a significant reduction (P < 0.05) of the urinary calcium to creatinine ratio (an index of bone resorption). Liver protein synthesis was the most sensitive parameter to the action of estrogen. Hepatic resoponses were variable depending on which protein was assessed. These data indicate that the oral administration of conjugated equine estrogens results in inconsistent effects. All doses exerted subphysiological, physiological, and pharmacological responses at the different sites of action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
An in vivo system in man for quantitation of estrogenicity
Moore, D. E., Kawagoe, S., Davajan, V., Nakamura, R. M., & Mishell, D. R. (1978) · American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1016/0002-9378(78)90294-6 · Cited by 57
Cited by
Transdermal testosterone treatment in women with impaired sexual function after oophorectomy.
Shifren, J. L., Braunstein, G. D., Simon, J. A., Casson, P. R., Buster, J. E., Redmond, G. P., Burki, R. E., Ginsburg, E. S., Rosen, R. C., Leiblum, S. R., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200009073431002 · Cited by 954
Pharmacology of estrogens and progestogens: influence of different routes of administration
Kuhl, H. (2005) · Climacteric · doi:10.1080/13697130500148875 · Cited by 835
Oral oestrogen and combined oestrogen/progestogen therapy versus placebo for hot flushes
MacLennan, A. H., Broadbent, J. L., Lester, S., & Moore, V. (2004) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd002978.pub2 · Cited by 543
Whitehead, M. I., Townsend, P. T., Pryse-Davies, J., Ryder, T. A., & King, R. J. B. (1981) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198112313052701 · Cited by 396
Edman, C. D. (1983) · Clinical Perspectives in Obstetrics and Gynecology · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-5525-3_6 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- GEOLA, F. L., FRUMAR, A. M., TATARYN, I. V., LU, K. H., HERSHMAN, J. M., EGGENA, P., SAMBHI, M. P., & JUDD, H. L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1980-09
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 620-625
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1969768261
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biological Effects of Various Doses of Conjugated Equine Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-51-3-620
- The paper
- GEOLA, F. L., FRUMAR, A. M., TATARYN, I. V., LU, K. H., HERSHMAN, J. M., EGGENA, P., SAMBHI, M. P., & JUDD, H. L. (1980). Biological Effects of Various Doses of Conjugated Equine Estrogens in Postmenopausal Women*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-51-3-620
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.