The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Situ Estrogen Production via the Estrone Sulfatase Pathway in Breast Tumors: Relative Importance versus the Aromatase Pathway*
Abstract
Estrone and estradiol concentrations in breast tumor tissue are an order of magnitude higher than circulating plasma levels in postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Local production of estrogen in the neoplastic tissue is one of several possible explanations for this plasma/tissue gradient. This study evaluated breast tumor estrogen production via the estrone sulfate to estrone (sulfatase) pathway and compared this with the androstenedione to estrone (aromatase) system in human and rodent mammary tumors. Estrogen production from estrone sulfate was related linearly with time and tissue concentrations, exhibited an apparent Km of 20 microM, and produced a linear Eadie-Hofstee kinetic plot consistent with a single class of enzymatic sites. Measurement of sulfatase in 35 human breast tumors using enzyme saturating conditions revealed estrone production ranging from 0.8-125 mumol/g protein . h. The corresponding range in host mammary tumors was 3.5-7.1 mumol/g protein . h. In human breast tumors, sulfatase activity did not correlate with the levels of estrogen receptor or progesterone receptor. Comparison of sulfatase with aromatase activity in human tumors at physiological levels of substrate revealed estrone formation via sulfatase of 2.8 pmol estrone produced/g protein . h, while aromatase produced only 0.27 pmol/g protein . h. In rat mammary tumors, sulfatase activity was similar to that in human tumors, whereas aromatase activity could not be detected, even with a highly sensitive assay. Thus, estrone sulfatase appears to be the enzyme primarily responsible for intratissue estrone production in hormone-dependent breast carcinomas.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
HIGH ABSORPTION BUT VERY LOW BIOAVAILABILITY OF ORAL RESVERATROL IN HUMANS
Walle, T., Hsieh, F., DeLegge, M. H., Oatis, J. E., & Walle, U. K. (2004) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1124/dmd.104.000885 · Cited by 1,880
Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of estrogens and its regulation in human
Tsuchiya, Y., Nakajima, M., & Yokoi, T. (2005) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2004.10.007 · Cited by 616
A Review of Coumarin Derivatives in Pharmacotherapy of Breast Cancer
Musa, M., Cooperwood, J., & Khan, M. O. (2008) · Current Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.2174/092986708786242877 · Cited by 538
Steroid sulfatase: molecular biology, regulation, and inhibition
Reed, M. J., Purohit, A., Woo, L. W. L., Newman, S. P., & Potter, B. V. L. (2005) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2004-0003 · Cited by 524
The Regulation of Steroid Action by Sulfation and Desulfation
Mueller, J. W., Gilligan, L. C., Idkowiak, J., Arlt, W., & Foster, P. A. (2015) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2015-1036 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- SANTNER, S. J., FEIL, P. D., & SANTEN, R. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1984-07
- Volume
- 59
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 29-33
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1980545656
- Cited by
- 406
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Situ Estrogen Production via the Estrone Sulfatase Pathway in Breast Tumors: Relative Importance versus the Aromatase Pathway*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-59-1-29
- The paper
- SANTNER, S. J., FEIL, P. D., & SANTEN, R. J. (1984). In Situ Estrogen Production via the Estrone Sulfatase Pathway in Breast Tumors: Relative Importance versus the Aromatase Pathway*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-59-1-29
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.