Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation

NAVOT, DANIEL, BERGH, PAUL A., WILLIAMS, MARYANNE, GARRLSI, G. JOHN, GUZMAN, IDA, SANDLER, BENJAMIN, FOX, JANIS, SCHREINER-ENGEL, PATRICIA, HOFMANN, GLEN E., GRUNFELD, LAWRENCE·1991·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

To gain insight into early reproductive processes we have prospectively designed ovum donation protocols to elucidate several phenomena relating to embryo implantation and pregnancy sustenance. Artificial endometrial cycles with variable follicular phases were induced in 60 recipients by sequential estrogen and progesterone. A total of 964 oocytes were retrieved throughout 43 ovum donation attempts, for an average of 22.4 (range, 16-41) eggs/retrieval. The overall delivery rate per egg retrieval (donors and recipients combined) was 72.1% (31 of 43). The shortest estrogen stimulation (short follicular phase) resulting in ongoing pregnancies was 5 days in duration, while the longest (long follicular phase) was 35 days in duration before progesterone initiation. Utilization of variable length follicular phases, artificially extended the stage of endometrial receptivity to over 4 weeks. To assess the window of implantation, same age embryos were transferred onto endometrium of different maturational stages. Pregnancies were documented with embryo transfers between luteal day 1 (day 15) to luteal day 6 (day 20), extending the window of implantation in the human to at least 6 consecutive days. To evaluate the relative contribution of oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity to pregnancy outcome, common source ova were transferred onto endometrium with variable hormonal exposure. Despite the drastically different follicular phase estradiol levels and periods of exposure, similar delivery rates were attained in donor cycles (29.4%) and recipient cycles during short follicular phases (29.6%). Slightly higher delivery rates (39.4%) were observed with long follicular phases. The comparable pregnancy rates in donors and recipients are attributed to the common source oocytes regardless of endometrial stimulation.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem-72-2-408

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
NAVOT, D., BERGH, P. A., WILLIAMS, M., GARRLSI, G. J., GUZMAN, I., SANDLER, B., FOX, J., SCHREINER-ENGEL, P., HOFMANN, G. E., & GRUNFELD, L.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1991-02
Volume
72
Issue
2
Pages
408-414
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W1964021013
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
10.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-72-2-408
The paper
NAVOT, D., BERGH, P. A., WILLIAMS, M., GARRLSI, G. J., GUZMAN, I., SANDLER, B., FOX, J., SCHREINER-ENGEL, P., HOFMANN, G. E., & GRUNFELD, L. (1991). An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-72-2-408

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.