The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation
Abstract
To gain insight into early reproductive processes we have prospectively designed ovum donation protocols to elucidate several phenomena relating to embryo implantation and pregnancy sustenance. Artificial endometrial cycles with variable follicular phases were induced in 60 recipients by sequential estrogen and progesterone. A total of 964 oocytes were retrieved throughout 43 ovum donation attempts, for an average of 22.4 (range, 16-41) eggs/retrieval. The overall delivery rate per egg retrieval (donors and recipients combined) was 72.1% (31 of 43). The shortest estrogen stimulation (short follicular phase) resulting in ongoing pregnancies was 5 days in duration, while the longest (long follicular phase) was 35 days in duration before progesterone initiation. Utilization of variable length follicular phases, artificially extended the stage of endometrial receptivity to over 4 weeks. To assess the window of implantation, same age embryos were transferred onto endometrium of different maturational stages. Pregnancies were documented with embryo transfers between luteal day 1 (day 15) to luteal day 6 (day 20), extending the window of implantation in the human to at least 6 consecutive days. To evaluate the relative contribution of oocyte quality and endometrial receptivity to pregnancy outcome, common source ova were transferred onto endometrium with variable hormonal exposure. Despite the drastically different follicular phase estradiol levels and periods of exposure, similar delivery rates were attained in donor cycles (29.4%) and recipient cycles during short follicular phases (29.6%). Slightly higher delivery rates (39.4%) were observed with long follicular phases. The comparable pregnancy rates in donors and recipients are attributed to the common source oocytes regardless of endometrial stimulation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in novel reproductive technologies: prevention and treatment
Wallach, E. E., Navot, D., Bergh, P. A., & Laufer, N. (1992) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55188-7 · Cited by 621
Self-citationRiesewijk, A. (2003) · Molecular Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/molehr/gag037 · Cited by 414
The impact of embryonic development and endometrial maturity on the timing of implantation
Bergh, P. A., & Navot, D. (1992) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)55259-5 · Cited by 327
Self-citationHow uterine microbiota might be responsible for a receptive, fertile endometrium
Benner, M., Ferwerda, G., Joosten, I., & van der Molen, R. G. (2018) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmy012 · Cited by 304
Endometrial preparation: lessons from oocyte donation
Wallach, E. E., Younis, J. S., Simon, A., & Laufer, N. (1996) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58677-4 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- NAVOT, D., BERGH, P. A., WILLIAMS, M., GARRLSI, G. J., GUZMAN, I., SANDLER, B., FOX, J., SCHREINER-ENGEL, P., HOFMANN, G. E., & GRUNFELD, L.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1991-02
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 408-414
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W1964021013
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-72-2-408
- The paper
- NAVOT, D., BERGH, P. A., WILLIAMS, M., GARRLSI, G. J., GUZMAN, I., SANDLER, B., FOX, J., SCHREINER-ENGEL, P., HOFMANN, G. E., & GRUNFELD, L. (1991). An Insight into Early Reproductive Processes through the in Vivo Model of Ovum Donation. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-72-2-408
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.