The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology
Open accessAbstract
In humans, embryonic implantation and reproduction depends on the interaction of the embryo with the receptive endometrium. To gain a global molecular understanding of human endometrial receptivity, we compared gene expression profiles of pre-receptive (day LH+2) versus receptive (LH+7) endometria obtained from the same fertile woman (n = 5) in the same menstrual cycle in five independent experiments. Biopsies were analysed using the Affymetrix HG-U95A array, a DNA chip containing approximately 12,000 genes. Using the pre-defined criteria of a fold change >/=3 in at least four out of five women, we identified 211 regulated genes. Of these, 153 were up-regulated at LH+7 versus LH+2, whereas 58 were down-regulated. Amongst these 211 regulated genes, we identified genes that were known to play a role in the development of a receptive endometrium, and genes for which a role in endometrial receptivity, or even endometrial expression, has not been previously described. Validation of array data was accomplished by mRNA quantification by real time quantitative fluorescent PCR (Q-PCR) of three up-regulated [glutathione peroxidase 3 (GPx-3), claudin 4 (claudin-4) and solute carrier family 1 member 1 (SLC1A1)] genes in independent LH+2 versus LH+7 endometrial samples from fertile women (n = 3) and the three up-regulated genes throughout the menstrual cycle (n = 15). Human claudin-4 peaks specifically during the implantation window, whereas GPx-3 and SLC1A1 showed highest expression in the late secretory phase. In-situ hybridization (ISH) experiments showed that GPx-3 and SLC1A1 expression was restricted to glandular and luminal epithelial cells during the mid- and late luteal phase. The present work adds new and important data in this field, and highlights the complexity of studying endometrial receptivity even using global gene-expression analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Quantitative Monitoring of Gene Expression Patterns with a Complementary DNA Microarray
Schena, M., Shalon, D., Davis, R. W., & Brown, P. O. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.270.5235.467 · Cited by 9,609
Goodall, C. (1988) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.1988.10488412 · Cited by 8,675
Noyes, R. W., Hertig, A. T., & Rock, J. (1950) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/s0015-0282(16)30062-0 · Cited by 2,843
Blastocyst implantation depends on maternal expression of leukaemia inhibitory factor
Stewart, C. L., Kaspar, P., Brunet, L. J., Bhatt, H., Gadi, I., Köntgen, F., & Abbondanzo, S. J. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/359076a0 · Cited by 2,034
Multiple Female Reproductive Failures in Cyclooxygenase 2–Deficient Mice
Lim, H., Paria, B. C., Das, S. K., Dinchuk, J. E., Langenbach, R., Trzaskos, J. M., & Dey, S. K. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80402-x · Cited by 1,430
Functional comparisons of three glutamate transporter subtypes cloned from human motor cortex
Arriza, J., Fairman, W., Wadiche, J., Murdoch, G., Kavanaugh, M., & Amara, S. (1994) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.14-09-05559.1994 · Cited by 993
Global gene profiling in human endometrium during the window of implantation
Kao, L. C., Tulac, S., Lobo, S., Imani, B., Yang, J. P., Germeyer, A., Osteen, K., Taylor, R. N., Lessey, B. A., & Giudice, L. C. (2002) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/endo.143.6.8885 · Cited by 727
DNA microarrays in drug discovery and development
Debouck, C., & Goodfellow, P. N. (1999) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/4475 · Cited by 652
Van Itallie, C., Rahner, C., & Anderson, J. M. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci12464 · Cited by 601
Hough, C. D., Sherman‐Baust, C. A., Pizer, E. S., Montz, F. J., Im, D. D., Rosenshein, N. B., Cho, K. R., Riggins, G. J., & Morin, P. J. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 502
Cited by
Roadmap to embryo implantation: clues from mouse models
Wang, H., & Dey, S. K. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1808 · Cited by 1,298
A genomic diagnostic tool for human endometrial receptivity based on the transcriptomic signature
Díaz-Gimeno, P., Horcajadas, J. A., Martínez-Conejero, J. A., Esteban, F. J., Alamá, P., Pellicer, A., & Simón, C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.04.063 · Cited by 687
Talbi, S., Hamilton, A. E., Vo, K. C., Tulac, S., Overgaard, M. T., Dosiou, C., Le Shay, N., Nezhat, C. N., Kempson, R., Lessey, B. A., et al. (2006) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.2005-1076 · Cited by 589
Endocrine regulation of menstruation
Jabbour, H. N., Kelly, R. W., Fraser, H. M., & Critchley, H. O. D. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2004-0021 · Cited by 588
Physiological and molecular determinants of embryo implantation
Zhang, S., Lin, H., Kong, S., Wang, S., Wang, H., Wang, H., & Armant, D. R. (2013) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2012.12.011 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Riesewijk, A.
- Venue
- Molecular Human Reproduction
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2003-05-01
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 253-264
- ISSN
- 1360-9947 (ISSN-L)
- 1460-2407
- OpenAlex
- W2123080882
- Cited by
- 414
- References
- 32
- FWCI
- 7.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1093/molehr/gag037
- The paper
- Riesewijk, A. (2003). Gene expression profiling of human endometrial receptivity on days LH+2 versus LH+7 by microarray technology. Molecular Human Reproduction. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gag037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.