The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Influence of Osteophytes and Aortic Calcification on Spinal Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women*
Abstract
The assessment of vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) in the anterio-posterior projection has become widely used in the management and prevention of osteoporosis. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the presence of spinal osteophytes has a major impact on measured BMD in men, thus casting doubt on the value of these BMD measurements. We have assessed the impact of osteophytic and aortic calcification on spinal and femoral BMD measurements in 130 normal postmenopausal women, aged 45-71 yr. Lateral lumbar spine radiographs were obtained in all subjects and graded separately (0-3) for osteophytes and aortic calcification. Both forms of calcification increased with age, and BMD of all sites was correlated positively with body weight and negatively with age. The correlation coefficients between BMD and calcification scores were nonsignificant. Multiple regression analysis, including weight, age, and calcification scores, demonstrated a small but significant effect of osteophyte score on lumbar BMD (partial r2 = 0.04; P = 0.012) and a similar trend for Ward's triangle and the trochanteric region (partial r2 = 0.02; P less than 0.06). The aortic calcification score remained nonsignificant. It is concluded that the influence of spinal osteophytes on lumbar BMD in postmenopausal women is substantially less than that in men and is, therefore, unlikely to interfere with BMD estimation in most subjects. The relationship between proximal femoral BMD and osteophyte score suggests a real relationship between skeletal density and degenerative joint disease, as has been demonstrated by others.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ten Years' Experience with Alendronate for Osteoporosis in Postmenopausal Women
Bone, H. G., Hosking, D., Devogelaer, J.-P., Tucci, J. R., Emkey, R. D., Tonino, R. P., Rodriguez-Portales, J. A., Downs, R. W., Gupta, J., Santora, A. C., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa030897 · Cited by 1,347
Khosla, S. (2001) · Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.86.8.3555 · Cited by 522
Hak, A. E., Pols, H. A. P., van Hemert, A. M., Hofman, A., & Witteman, J. C. M. (2000) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/01.atv.20.8.1926 · Cited by 375
Arlot, M. E., Sornay-Rendu, E., Garnero, P., Vey-Marty, B., & Delmas, P. D. (1997) · Journal of Bone and Mineral Research · doi:10.1359/jbmr.1997.12.4.683 · Cited by 299
Osteoarthritis and osteoporosis: Clinical and research evidence of inverse relationship
Dequeker, J., Aerssens, J., & Luyten, F. P. (2003) · Aging Clinical and Experimental Research · doi:10.1007/bf03327364 · Cited by 269
Metadata
- Authors
- REID, I. R., EVANS, M. C., AMES, R., & WATTIE, D. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 72
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1372-1374
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2107262657
- Cited by
- 231
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Influence of Osteophytes and Aortic Calcification on Spinal Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women*. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem-72-6-1372
- The paper
- REID, I. R., EVANS, M. C., AMES, R., & WATTIE, D. J. (1991). The Influence of Osteophytes and Aortic Calcification on Spinal Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women*. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem-72-6-1372
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.