Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 210

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-α) and Beta (ER-β) mRNAs in Normal Ovary, Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma and Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines: Down-Regulation of ER-β in Neoplastic Tissues

Brandenberger, Alfred W., Tee, Meng Kian, Jaffe, Roberts B.·1998·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

The prognosis in ovarian carcinoma, the most lethal of the gynecologic neoplasms, is poor and has changed little in the last three decades. Only a small number respond to antiestrogen therapy, although the classic estrogen receptor, ER-α, has been identified in ovarian surface epithelium, from which approximately 90% of ovarian cancers originate. We have previously shown that ER-β mRNA is most abundant in human fetal ovaries, suggesting that it might play an important role in ovarian development. Therefore, we investigated the mRNA levels of both ERs in normal ovaries, ovarian serous cystadenocarcinomas, granulosa cells from patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF), the ovarian surface epithelium cell line IOSE-Van, and the ovarian cancer cell lines SKOV3, HEY and OCC1. Northern blots of normal and neoplastic ovaries were hybridized with an ER-β riboprobe that spans the A/B domain. We detected two major hybridizing bands at approximately 8 and 10 kb. An RNase protection assay using the same probe revealed a single band of the expected size. Hybridizing the same blot with an ER-α riboprobe showed a strong hybridizing band at approximately 6.5 kb. In ovarian cancer samples, ER-β mRNA level was decreased when compared to normal ovaries. Using 25 cycles of RT-PCR followed by Southern blotting, we found equal amounts of ER-α and -β mRNAs in normal ovaries in all age groups from 33 to 75 years; however, in ovarian cancer tissue, the level of ER-α mRNA was similar or slightly higher, comparable to 103 to 104 copies of plasmid DNA, but ER-β mRNA levels were markedly decreased. Granulosa cells from IVF patients expressed high levels of ER-β mRNA. The OSE cell line expressed low level of ER-α, detectable after 40 cycles of RT-PCR and no ER-β mRNA. SKOV3, showed low level of ER-α and β mRNAs, whereas OCC1 showed low level of ER-β and relatively high level of ER-α. HEY did not contain detectable amounts of either ER after 40 cycles of RT-PCR. We found no evidence of differential splicing or major deletions in almost the entire coding region of ER-β in either normal ovaries or tumor samples.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.83.3.4788

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 210

Metadata

Authors
Brandenberger, A. W., Tee, M. K., & Jaffe, R. B.
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1998-03-01
Volume
83
Issue
3
Pages
1025-1028
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2080321597
Cited by
210
References
0
FWCI
15.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-α) and Beta (ER-β) mRNAs in Normal Ovary, Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma and Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines: Down-Regulation of ER-β in Neoplastic Tissues. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/jcem.83.3.4788
The paper
Brandenberger, A. W., Tee, M. K., & Jaffe, R. B. (1998). Estrogen Receptor Alpha (ER-α) and Beta (ER-β) mRNAs in Normal Ovary, Ovarian Serous Cystadenocarcinoma and Ovarian Cancer Cell Lines: Down-Regulation of ER-β in Neoplastic Tissues. The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1210/jcem.83.3.4788

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.