The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Follicle-Stimulating Hormone (FSH) Threshold/Window Concept Examined by Different Interventions with Exogenous FSH during the Follicular Phase of the Normal Menstrual Cycle: Duration, Rather Than Magnitude, of FSH Increase Affects Follicle Development1
Open accessAbstract
According to the threshold concept, FSH concentrations need to surpass a distinct level to stimulate ovarian follicle growth. The window concept stresses the significance of a limited duration of elevated FSH levels above the threshold for single dominant follicle selection. The aim of this study was to investigate effects on follicle growth of increased FSH levels, differing in duration and magnitude of elevation, during the follicular phase. Twenty-three normo-ovulatory (cycle length, 26-31 days), young (age, 20-31 yr) women volunteered for this study. In all subjects a series of daily transvaginal sonography scans of the ovaries and blood sampling [for FSH and estradiol (E2) determinations] were performed during two consecutive cycles. The first study cycle (control cycle) started 10 days after urinary assessment of the LH surge in the preceding cycle (DayLH) and was concluded on the day of ovulation assessed by transvaginal sonography scans. The second series of daily monitoring (intervention cycle) started 10 days after DayLH in the control cycle. After randomization, subjects received either 375 IU urinary FSH, s.c., as a single injection on Day(LH+14) (group A; n = 11) or 75 IU daily from Day(LH+19) until Day(LH+23) (group B; n = 12). In group A, FSH levels increased on the day after injection to a median concentration of 10.1 IU/L, which was 1.9 times higher (P < 0.01) than levels on matching days during the control cycle. Concentrations returned to basal levels 3 day…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The time period during which FSH is above a certain threshold affects the number of follicles reaching the dominant follicle's size.
“The time period during which FSH is above a certain threshold effects the number of follicles reaching the dominant follicle's size (Schipper et al., 1998;Baird, 1990).”
From Hormonal regulation of ovarian follicle growth in humans: Model-based exploration of cycle variability and parameter sensitivities (2022) · cites this paper as Schipper et al., 1998
Citations
Cites
Control of preovulatory follicular estrogen biosynthesis in the human ovary
HILLIER, S. G., REICHERT, L. E., & VAN HALL, E. V. (1981) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jcem-52-5-847 · Cited by 163
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ovarian antral folliculogenesis during the human menstrual cycle: A review
Baerwald, A. R., Adams, G. P., & Pierson, R. A. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr039 · Cited by 487
Stanczyk, F. Z., Archer, D. F., & Bhavnani, B. R. (2013) · Contraception · doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2012.12.011 · Cited by 201
Fischer-Holzhausen, S., & Röblitz, S. (2022) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111150 · Cited by 17
Mathematical Modeling and Simulation Provides Evidence for New Strategies of Ovarian Stimulation
Fischer, S., Ehrig, R., Schäfer, S., Tronci, E., Mancini, T., Egli, M., Ille, F., Krüger, T. H. C., Leeners, B., & Röblitz, S. (2021) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2021.613048 · Cited by 13
“This concept is based on the observation that the period of time during which FSH is above a certain threshold effects the number of follicles reaching the dominant follicle’s size (50, 51).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Schipper, I., Hop, W. C. J., & Fauser, B. C. J. M.
- Affiliations
- Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam (NL)
- Venue
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 83
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1292-1298
- ISSN
- 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
- 1945-7197
- OpenAlex
- W2047028513
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 9
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.eur.nl
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
- Keywords
- follicle-stimulating hormone, ovarian follicle development, follicular phase, dominant follicle selection, estradiol, luteinizing hormone surge, ovulation, menstrual cycle, transvaginal ultrasound
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Estradiol, Female, Follicular Phase, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Luteinizing Hormone, Reference Values, Secretory Rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review