Cited by 120Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth FactorsReproductive Biology and FertilityOvarian function and disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Evidence That the Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein-4 Protease in Human Ovarian Follicular Fluid Is Pregnancy Associated Plasma Protein-A

Conover, Cheryl A., Oxvig, Claus, Overgaard, Michael T., Christiansen, Michael, Giudice, Linda C.·1999·The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism

Abstract

Ovarian insulin-like growth factor binding protein-4 (IGFBP-4) proteolysis is involved in the regulation of follicular development, but until now the identity of the responsible enzyme was unknown. In this study, we identify the IGFBP4 protease in human follicular fluid as pregnancy associated plasma protein-A (PAPP-A) based on distinctive IGFBP-4 cleavage pattern, the same protease inhibitor profile, specific inhibition and immunodepletion of IGFBP-4 protease activity with PAPP-A polyclonal antibodies, and immunorecognition by PAPP-A monoclonal antibodies in ELISA. Furthermore, PAPP-A levels in estrogen-dominant and androgen-dominant follicular fluids reflect their IGFBP-4 proteolytic activity. PAPP-A was also secreted by human granulosa cells, the reputed source of IGFBP-4 protease activity in follicular fluid. We have the molecular and biochemical tools to begin to delineate the regulation and biological function of PAPP-A in normal and dysregulated follicular development and atresia.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1210/jcem.84.12.6342

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Conover, C. A., Oxvig, C., Overgaard, M. T., Christiansen, M., & Giudice, L. C.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Statens Serum Institut (DK)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Venue
The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Published
1999-12
Volume
84
Issue
12
Pages
4742-4745
ISSN
  • 0021-972X (ISSN-L)
  • 1945-7197
OpenAlex
W2051842303
Cited by
120
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD031579, HD 31579-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Growth Hormone and Insulin-like Growth Factors
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Reproductive Biology and Fertility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Ovarian function and disorders
Keywords
IGFBP-4, PAPP-A, follicular fluid, granulosa cells, folliculogenesis, follicular atresia
MeSH terms
Edetic Acid, Enzyme Inhibitors, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Female, Fertilization in Vitro, Fibroblasts, Humans, Metalloendopeptidases, Phenanthrolines, Pregnancy-Associated Plasma Protein-A, Follicular Fluid, Culture Media, Conditioned, Insulin-Like Growth Factor Binding Protein 4

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review