The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Nuclear Receptors Have Distinct Affinities for Coactivators: Characterization by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer
Open accessAbstract
UNLABELLED: Ligand-dependent interactions between nuclear receptors and members of a family of nuclear receptor coactivators are associated with transcriptional activation. Here we used fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) as an approach for detecting and quantitating such interactions. Using the ligand binding domain (LBD) of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPARgamma) as a model, known agonists (thiazolidinediones and delta12, 14-PGJ2) induced a specific interaction resulting in FRET between the fluorescently labeled LBD and fluorescently labeled coactivators [CREB-binding protein (CBP) or steroid receptor coactivator-1 (SRC-1)]. Specific energy transfer was dose dependent; individual ligands displayed distinct potency and maximal FRET profiles that were identical when results obtained using CBP vs. SRC-1 were compared. In addition, half-maximally effective agonist concentrations (EC59s) correlated well with reported results using cell-based assays. A site-directed AF2 mutant of PPARgamma (E471A) that abrogated ligand-stimulated transcription in transfected cells also failed to induce ligand-mediated FRET between PPARgamma LBD and CBP or SRC-1. Using estrogen receptor (ERalpha) as an alternative system, known agonists induced an interaction between ERalpha LBD and SRC-1, whereas ER antagonists disrupted agonist-induced interaction of ERalpha with SRC-1. In the presence of saturating agonist concentrations, unlabeled CBP or SRC-1 was used to compete with fluorescently labeled coactivators with saturation kinetics. Relative affinities for the individual receptor-coactivator pairs were determined as follows: PPARgamma-CBP = ERalpha-SRC-1 > PPARgamma-SRC-1 >> ERalpha-CBP. CONCLUSIONS: 1) FRET-based coactivator association is a novel approach for characterizing nuclear receptor agonists or antagonists; individual ligands display potencies that are predictive of in vivo effects and distinct profiles of maximal activity that are suggestive of alternative receptor conformations. 2) PPARgamma interacts with both CBP and SRC-1; transcriptional activation and coactivator association are AF2 dependent. 3) Nuclear receptor LBDs have distinct affinities for individual coactivators; thus, PPARgamma has a greater apparent affinity for CBP than for SRC-1, whereas ERalpha interacts preferentially with SRC-1 but very weakly with CBP.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The nuclear receptor superfamily: the second decade
Mangelsdorf, D. J., Thummel, C., Beato, M., Herrlich, P., Schütz, G., Umesono, K., Blumberg, B., Kastner, P., Mark, M., Chambon, P., et al. (1995) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(95)90199-x · Cited by 6,964
The peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ is a negative regulator of macrophage activation
Ricote, M., Li, A. C., Willson, T. M., Kelly, C. J., & Glass, C. K. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/34178 · Cited by 3,525
A signature motif in transcriptional co-activators mediates binding to nuclear receptors
Heery, D. M., Kalkhoven, E., Hoare, S., & Parker, M. G. (1997) · Nature · doi:10.1038/42750 · Cited by 2,128
Nuclear protein CBP is a coactivator for the transcription factor CREB
Kwok, R. P. S., Lundblad, J. R., Chrivia, J. C., Richards, J. P., Bächinger, H. P., Brennan, R. G., Roberts, S. G. E., Green, M. R., & Goodman, R. H. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/370223a0 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
Identification of a nuclear receptor for bile acids
Makishima, M., Okamoto, A. Y., Repa, J. J., Tu, H., Learned, R. M., Luk, A., Hull, M. V., Lustig, K. D., Mangelsdorf, D. J., & Shan, B. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1362 · Cited by 2,714
The mechanisms of action of PPARs
Berger, J., & Moller, D. E. (2002) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev.med.53.082901.104018 · Cited by 2,659
Bile Acids: Natural Ligands for an Orphan Nuclear Receptor
Parks, D. J., Blanchard, S. G., Bledsoe, R. K., Chandra, G., Consler, T. G., Kliewer, S. A., Stimmel, J. B., Willson, T. M., Zavacki, A. M., Moore, D. D., et al. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.284.5418.1365 · Cited by 2,274
The PPARs: From Orphan Receptors to Drug Discovery
Willson, T. M., Brown, P. J., Sternbach, D. D., & Henke, B. R. (2000) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jm990554g · Cited by 1,816
Endogenous Bile Acids Are Ligands for the Nuclear Receptor FXR/BAR
Wang, H., Chen, J., Hollister, K., Sowers, L. C., & Forman, B. M. (1999) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/s1097-2765(00)80348-2 · Cited by 1,636
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhou, G.
- Venue
- Molecular Endocrinology
- Publisher
- The Endocrine Society
- Published
- 1998-10-01
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1594-1604
- ISSN
- 0888-8809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2139717510
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 6.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nuclear Receptors Have Distinct Affinities for Coactivators: Characterization by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1210/me.12.10.1594
- The paper
- Zhou, G. (1998). Nuclear Receptors Have Distinct Affinities for Coactivators: Characterization by Fluorescence Resonance Energy Transfer. Molecular Endocrinology. https://doi.org/10.1210/me.12.10.1594
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.