Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 635

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized, comparative study of interferon β-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial

Panitch, H., Goodin, D.S., Francis, G., Chang, P., Coyle, P.K., O’Connor, P., Monaghan, E., Li, D., Weinshenker, B.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Interferon beta (IFNbeta) reduces relapses and MRI activity in relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), with variable effects on disability. The most effective dose regimen remains controversial. METHODS: This randomized, controlled, multicenter trial compared the efficacy and safety of IFNbeta-1a (Rebif) 44 micro g subcutaneously three times weekly (tiw), and IFNbeta-1a (Avonex) 30 micro g IM once weekly (qw) in 677 patients with RRMS. Assessors blinded to treatment performed neurologic and MRI evaluations. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who were relapse free at 24 weeks; the principal MRI endpoint was the number of active lesions per patient per scan at 24 weeks. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, 74.9% (254/339) of patients receiving IFNbeta-1a 44 micro g tiw remained relapse free compared with 63.3% (214/338) of those given 30 micro g qw. The odds ratio for remaining relapse free was 1.9 (95% CI, 1.3 to 2.6; p = 0.0005) at 24 weeks and 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1 to 2.1; p = 0.009) at 48 weeks, favoring 44 micro g tiw. Patients receiving 44 micro g tiw had fewer active MRI lesions (p < 0.001 at 24 and 48 weeks) compared with those receiving 30 micro g qw. Injection-site reactions were more frequent with 44 micro g tiw (83% vs 28%, p < 0.001), as were asymptomatic abnormalities of liver enzymes (18% vs 9%, p = 0.002) and altered leukocyte counts (11% vs 5%, p = 0.003) compared with the 30 micro g qw dosage. Neutralizing antibodies developed in 25% of 44 micro g tiw patients and in 2% of patients receiving 30 micro g qw. CONCLUSIONS: IFNbeta-1a 44 micro g subcutaneously tiw was more effective than IFNbeta-1a 30 micro g IM qw on all primary and secondary outcomes investigated after 24 and 48 weeks of treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000034080.43681.da

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 635

Metadata

Authors
Panitch, H., Goodin, D. S., Francis, G., Chang, P., Coyle, P. K., O’Connor, P., Monaghan, E., Li, D., & Weinshenker, B.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-11-26
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
1496-1506
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1983999022
Cited by
635
References
3
FWCI
27.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized, comparative study of interferon β-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000034080.43681.da
The paper
Panitch, H., Goodin, D. S., Francis, G., Chang, P., Coyle, P. K., O’Connor, P., Monaghan, E., Li, D., & Weinshenker, B. (2002). Randomized, comparative study of interferon β-1a treatment regimens in MS: The EVIDENCE Trial. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000034080.43681.da

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.