Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Predicting verbal memory decline following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL)

Stroup, E., Langfitt, J., Berg, M., McDermott, M., Pilcher, W., Como, P.·2003·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a multivariate risk factor model for predicting postoperative verbal memory decline in an individual patient following dominant or nondominant anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). METHODS: The authors studied 132 consecutive ATL patients who 1). were older than 16 years at surgery, 2). had estimated preoperative Full Scale IQ score of >69, 3) had unilateral language dominance based on the intracarotid amobarbital procedure (IAP), and 4) underwent neuropsychological testing at baseline and >or=6 months postoperatively (mean 1.2 years). Five potential risk factors for postoperative verbal memory decline were selected a priori that reflect the functional adequacy of the to-be-resected temporal lobe. These were 1). resection in the dominant hemisphere, 2). MRI findings other than exclusively unilateral mesial temporal sclerosis, intact preoperative 3). immediate and 4). delayed verbal memory function, and 5). intact IAP memory performance following injection contralateral to the seizure focus. Verbal memory decline was defined using two verbal memory tests and published reliable change indices. RESULTS: Thirty-eight percent of the sample declined reliably on one or both verbal memory measures. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that all five risk factors were significantly and independently associated with outcome, with side of surgery having the strongest association (p < 0.0001) and preoperative immediate verbal memory the weakest (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: An individual patient's risk for postoperative verbal memory decline following dominant or nondominant ATL can be predicted using clinical data routinely available preoperatively (side of surgery, qualitative MRI, baseline memory testing, IAP performance). This information may be useful for preoperative patient counseling.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000058765.33878.0d

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Stroup, E., Langfitt, J., Berg, M., McDermott, M., Pilcher, W., & Como, P.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2003-04-22
Volume
60
Issue
8
Pages
1266-1273
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1979808630
Cited by
243
References
0
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predicting verbal memory decline following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000058765.33878.0d
The paper
Stroup, E., Langfitt, J., Berg, M., McDermott, M., Pilcher, W., & Como, P. (2003). Predicting verbal memory decline following anterior temporal lobectomy (ATL). Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000058765.33878.0d

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.