The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A clinical trial of creatine in ALS
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Mitochondrial dysfunction occurs early in the course of ALS, and the mitochondria may be an important site for therapeutic intervention. Creatine stabilizes the mitochondrial transition pore, and is important in mitochondrial ATP production. In a transgenic mouse model of ALS, administration of creatine prolongs survival and preserves motor function and motor neurons. METHODS: The authors conducted a randomized double-blind, placebo controlled trial on 104 patients with ALS from 14 sites to evaluate the efficacy of creatine supplementation in ALS. The primary outcome measure was maximum voluntary isometric contraction of eight upper extremity muscles, with secondary outcomes including grip strength, ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, and motor unit number estimates. Patients were treated for 6 months, and evaluated monthly. RESULTS: Creatine was tolerated well, but no benefit of creatine could be demonstrated in any outcome measure. CI analysis showed that the study, although powered to detect a 50% or greater change in rate of decline of muscle strength, actually made an effect size of greater than 23% unlikely. It was also demonstrated that motor unit number estimation was performed with acceptable reproducibility and tolerability, and may be a useful outcome measure in future clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Any beneficial effect of creatine at 5 g per day in ALS must be small. Other agents should be considered in future studies of therapeutic agents to address mitochondrial dysfunction in ALS. In addition, motor unit number estimation may be a useful outcome measure for future clinical trials in ALS.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cedarbaum, J. M., Stambler, N., Malta, E., Fuller, C., Hilt, D., Thurmond, B., & Nakanishi, A. (1999) · Journal of the Neurological Sciences · doi:10.1016/s0022-510x(99)00210-5 · Cited by 3,307
Direct antioxidant properties of creatine
Lawler, J. M., Barnes, W. S., Wu, G., Song, W., & Demaree, S. (2002) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1006/bbrc.2001.6164 · Cited by 448
Cited by
Neuroinflammation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: role of glial activation in motor neuron disease
Philips, T., & Robberecht, W. (2011) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(11)70015-1 · Cited by 646
ALS clinical trials review: 20 years of failure. Are we any closer to registering a new treatment?
Petrov, D., Mansfield, C., Moussy, A., & Hermine, O. (2017) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00068 · Cited by 451
Synthesis and transport of creatine in the CNS: Importance for cerebral functions
Béard, E., & Braissant, O. (2010) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06935.x · Cited by 192
Creatine for treating muscle disorders
Kley, R. A., Tarnopolsky, M. A., & Vorgerd, M. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004760.pub4 · Cited by 169
Turner, C. E., Byblow, W. D., & Gant, N. (2015) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3113-14.2015 · Cited by 157
Metadata
- Authors
- Shefner, J. M., Cudkowicz, M. E., Schoenfeld, D., Conrad, T., Taft, J., Chilton, M., Urbinelli, L., Qureshi, M., Zhang, H., Pestronk, A., Caress, J., Donofrio, P., Sorenson, E., Bradley, W., Lomen-Hoerth, C., Pioro, E., Rezania, K., Ross, M., Pascuzzi, R., Heiman-Patterson, T., Tandan, R., Mitsumoto, H., Rothstein, J., Smith-Palmer, T., MacDonald, D., Burke, D., & the NEALS Consortium
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2004-11-09
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1656-1661
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2067856511
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.