Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 243

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The ALSFRSr predicts survival time in an ALS clinic population

Kaufmann, P., Levy, G., Thompson, J. L.P., DelBene, M. L., Battista, V., Gordon, P. H., Rowland, L. P., Levin, B., Mitsumoto, H.·2005·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-revised (ALSFRSr), a predictor of survival time in ALS clinical trials, predicts survival time in an ALS clinic population. METHODS: The authors prospectively evaluated 267 consecutive patients with ALS at first visit to an ALS clinic using the ALSFRSr and pulmonary function testing. The association of ALSFRSr score at baseline with death or tracheostomy in ALS was examined using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age at baseline, sex, and symptom duration. RESULTS: Of 267 patients with ALS, 103 (39%) reached the endpoint, defined as either death (79 patients) or tracheostomy (24 patients), during a mean follow-up of 1.0 +/- 0.7 years. Among the 103 patients who reached the endpoint during follow-up, 77 (75%) had a baseline ALSFRSr score of less than 38 (the median baseline score of all patients), compared to 53 of 164 (32%) who remained alive without tracheostomy. Patients with a total ALSFRSr score below the median had a 4.4-fold increased risk of death or tracheostomy compared to those who scored above the median (HR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.79 to 6.86, p < 0.001). Both the total ALSFRSr score at baseline (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98, p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity at baseline (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p = 0.02) were associated with death or tracheostomy when included in the same Cox model. CONCLUSIONS: In an ALS clinic population, the total Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale-revised score at baseline is a strong predictor of death or tracheostomy independently of forced vital capacity and after adjustment for age at baseline, sex, and symptom duration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000148648.38313.64

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 243

Metadata

Authors
Kaufmann, P., Levy, G., Thompson, J. L. P., DelBene, M. L., Battista, V., Gordon, P. H., Rowland, L. P., Levin, B., & Mitsumoto, H.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2005-01-11
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
38-43
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W1998437790
Cited by
243
References
2
FWCI
11.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The ALSFRSr predicts survival time in an ALS clinic population. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000148648.38313.64
The paper
Kaufmann, P., Levy, G., Thompson, J. L. P., DelBene, M. L., Battista, V., Gordon, P. H., Rowland, L. P., Levin, B., & Mitsumoto, H. (2005). The ALSFRSr predicts survival time in an ALS clinic population. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000148648.38313.64

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.