Cited by 220

Early symptom progression rate is related to ALS outcome: A prospective population-based study

Chiò, A., Mora, G., Leone, M., Mazzini, L., Cocito, D., Giordana, M. T., Bottacchi, E., Mutani, R.·2002·Neurology

Abstract

Objective To define the factors related to ALS outcome in a population-based, prospective survey. Methods The 221 patients (120 men and 101 women) listed in the Piemonte and Valle d'Aosta ALS Register between 1995 and 1996 were enrolled in the study. The patients were prospectively monitored with a standard evaluation form after diagnosis. Results Mean age at onset was 62.8 (SD = 11.2) years. According to El Escorial diagnostic criteria (EEDC), 112 patients had definite ALS, 85 probable ALS, 18 possible ALS, and six suspected ALS. The median survival time from symptom onset was 915 days (95% CI = 790 to 1065). The median survival time from diagnosis was 580 days (95% CI = 490 to 670). In univariate analysis, outcome was significantly related to age, onset site, EEDC classification, and symptom progression rate (i.e., the rate of decline of muscle strength and bulbar and respiratory function in the 6 months after diagnosis). In the Cox multivariate model, age, progression rate of respiratory, bulbar, and lower limb symptoms, EEDC classification, percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy, and treatment with riluzole were significantly related to outcome. Conclusions The rate of progression of symptoms in early ALS is predictive of disease outcome.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.59.1.99

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The median survival time is well within the range reported by several population-based studies, which extends from 16 months to 28 months, with most studies reporting values between 19 and 23 months.

    “it is well within the range reported by several population-based studies, which extends from 16 months (65;66) to 28 months (67), with most studies reporting values between 19 and 23 months (68–70).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chiò, A., Mora, G., Leone, M., Mazzini, L., Cocito, D., Giordana, M. T., Bottacchi, E., & Mutani, R.
Affiliations
From the Division of Neurology (Drs. Chiò and Mutani), Department of Neuroscience, University of Torino and Azienda Ospedaliera S. Giovanni Battista, Torino; Department of Neurological Rehabilitation (Dr. Mora), Fondazione S. Maugeri, Clinica del Lavoro e della Riabilitazione, IRCCS, Scientific Institute of Veruno; Division of Neurology (Dr. Leone), “A. Avogadro” University and Azienda Ospedaliera Maggiore della Carità, Novara; Department of Neurology (Dr. Mazzini), S. Giovanni Bosco Hospital,...
Venue
Neurology
Published
2002-07-09
Volume
59
Issue
1
Pages
99-103
ISSN
  • 0028-3878
  • 1526-632X
Cited by
220
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review