The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A population-based study of the incidence and prognosis of lacunar stroke
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate incidence and prognosis of lacunar stroke in a prospective, population-based patient registry. METHODS: The authors included first-ever strokes occurring between 1994 and 1998. They assessed incidence, risk factors, mortality, and recurrence in patients with lacunar stroke. RESULTS: The authors identified 491 patients (15.3%) with lacunar stroke (252 men and 239 women) and 2,153 patients (67.3%) with nonlacunar stroke (998 men and 1,155 women). Crude annual incidence rate for a first-ever lacunar stroke was 33.0/100,000 (95% CI 30.2 to 36.0). At the univariate logistic regression analysis among patients with lacunar stroke there was a higher proportion of cigarette smoking and hypercholesterolemia and a lower proportion of chronic atrial fibrillation than in patients with nonlacunar stroke. For lacunar stroke, the 30-day case-fatality rate was 4.3% (95% CI 2.5 to 6.1) and the 1-year case-fatality rate was 13.0% (95% CI 10.0 to 16.0). During the first year of follow-up the average annual stroke recurrence rate was lower in patients with lacunar (2.83%; 95% CI 1.36 to 4.30) than in those with nonlacunar stroke (5.10%; 95% CI 4.17 to 6.03) while from the second year onward, rates were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: In the short term, patients with nonlacunar stroke had more vascular events, but in the long term, the risk of death and of stroke recurrence was similar.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Feigin, V. L., Lawes, C. M., Bennett, D. A., & Anderson, C. S. (2003) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(03)00266-7 · Cited by 1,932
Cited by
Jackson, C. A., Hutchison, A., Dennis, M. S., Wardlaw, J. M., Lindgren, A., Norrving, B., Anderson, C. S., Hankey, G. J., Jamrozik, K., Appelros, P., et al. (2010) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.109.558809 · Cited by 131
Paul, R., Grieve, S., Niaura, R., David, S., Laidlaw, D., Cohen, R., Sweet, L., Taylor, G., Clark, R., Pogun, S., et al. (2008) · Nicotine & Tobacco Research · doi:10.1080/14622200701767829 · Cited by 129
Khan, A., Kasner, S. E., Lynn, M. J., & Chimowitz, M. I. (2012) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/strokeaha.111.641696 · Cited by 47
Clinical implications of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative diseases
Vinaiphat, A., & Sze, S. K. (2019) · Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics · doi:10.1080/14737159.2019.1657407 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Sacco, S., Marini, C., Totaro, R., Russo, T., Cerone, D., & Carolei, A.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-05-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1335-1338
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2150011749
- Cited by
- 176
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A population-based study of the incidence and prognosis of lacunar stroke. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210457.89798.0e
- The paper
- Sacco, S., Marini, C., Totaro, R., Russo, T., Cerone, D., & Carolei, A. (2006). A population-based study of the incidence and prognosis of lacunar stroke. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210457.89798.0e
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.