Cited by 20Extracellular vesicles in diseaseNanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

Clinical implications of extracellular vesicles in neurodegenerative diseases

Vinaiphat, Arada, Sze, Siu Kwan·2019·Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics

Abstract

Introduction: Extracellular vesicles (EVs) released by neural cells play a crucial role in intracellular communication in both physiological and pathological states. Recent studies have shown that the neuropathogenic manifestation of many progressive nervous system diseases including Parkinson’s disease (PD), Alzheimer’s diseases (AD), and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). These diseases are frequently found to be associated with the accumulation of misfolded proteins, exploit EVs for the spread of aggregates to naive cells in a prion-like mechanism. Therefore, characterization of EVs and understanding their mechanism of action could open a window of opportunity to discover biomarkers and therapeutic targets in a disease-specific manner.Areas covered: In this review, we discuss the role of neural cells-derived EVs in normal and disease states. We also highlight their biomedical potential in modern medicine, including the use of circulating EVs as biomarkers for diagnosis with a special focus on newly-identified potential biomarkers in neurodegenerative disease, and novel methodologies in EVs isolation.Expert opinion: Systematic and comprehensive analysis of EVs in different biofluid sources is needed. Considering the potential for tremendous clinical benefits of EVs research in neurodegenerative disease, there is also an urgent need to standardize neural cells-derived EV enrichment protocols for consensus results.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14737159.2019.1657407

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Recent research has highlighted the significant role of sEVs in the propagation of misfolded proteins in neurodegenerative diseases, suggesting they may facilitate intercellular transfer and contribute to the progression and severity of these conditions.

    “Recent research has highlighted the significant role of sEVs in the propagation of these misfolded proteins, suggesting they may facilitate intercellular transfer and contribute to the progression and severity of these conditions [130–132].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vinaiphat, A., & Sze, S. K.
Affiliations
Nanyang Technological University (SG)
Corresponding author
Sze, Siu Kwan
Venue
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Published
2019-08-23
Volume
19
Issue
9
Pages
813-824
ISSN
  • 1473-7159 (ISSN-L)
  • 1744-8352
OpenAlex
W2969535702
Cited by
20
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
extracellular vesicles, neurodegenerative diseases, Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, prion-like propagation, protein aggregation, biomarkers, EV isolation, biological fluids, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Neuroprotection, Extracellular Vesicles, Humans, Neurons, Prions, Biomarkers, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Exosomes, Proteostasis Deficiencies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review