Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 279

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study

Ikram, M. K., de Jong, F. J., Bos, M. J., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., de Jong, P. T.V.M., Breteler, M.M.B.·2006·Neurology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Retinal vessels may provide information on cerebral vascular pathology, because they share many features with cerebral vessels. A smaller ratio of the retinal arteriolar-to-venular diameters reportedly predicts the risk of stroke. It is unclear if this is due to arteriolar narrowing or venular dilation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether smaller arteriolar or larger venular diameters are related to the risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. METHODS: This study was based on the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study and included 5,540 participants of 55 years or over, who had gradable fundus transparencies and were free of stroke at baseline (1990 to 1993). For each participant, retinal arteriolar and venular diameters were measured on digitized images of one eye. Follow-up for first-ever stroke was complete until January 1, 2002. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 411 participants had a stroke, of whom 259 had cerebral infarction. Larger venular diameters were associated with an increased risk of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for age and sex per SD increase: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.24]) and cerebral infarction (HR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.29]). Smaller arteriolar diameters were neither related to the risk of stroke (HR per SD decrease: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.93 to 1.13]) nor to the risk of cerebral infarction (HR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.90 to 1.15]). After additional adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors, the results did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Larger retinal venular diameters are associated with an increased risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. The role of venules in cerebrovascular disease warrants further exploration.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 279

Metadata

Authors
Ikram, M. K., de Jong, F. J., Bos, M. J., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., de Jong, P. T. V. M., & Breteler, M. M. B.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2006-05-09
Volume
66
Issue
9
Pages
1339-1343
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2097005219
Cited by
279
References
0
FWCI
10.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea
The paper
Ikram, M. K., de Jong, F. J., Bos, M. J., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., de Jong, P. T. V. M., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2006). Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.