The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Retinal vessels may provide information on cerebral vascular pathology, because they share many features with cerebral vessels. A smaller ratio of the retinal arteriolar-to-venular diameters reportedly predicts the risk of stroke. It is unclear if this is due to arteriolar narrowing or venular dilation. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether smaller arteriolar or larger venular diameters are related to the risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. METHODS: This study was based on the prospective population-based Rotterdam Study and included 5,540 participants of 55 years or over, who had gradable fundus transparencies and were free of stroke at baseline (1990 to 1993). For each participant, retinal arteriolar and venular diameters were measured on digitized images of one eye. Follow-up for first-ever stroke was complete until January 1, 2002. RESULTS: After a mean follow-up of 8.5 years, 411 participants had a stroke, of whom 259 had cerebral infarction. Larger venular diameters were associated with an increased risk of stroke (hazard ratio [HR] adjusted for age and sex per SD increase: 1.12 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.24]) and cerebral infarction (HR: 1.15 [95% CI: 1.02 to 1.29]). Smaller arteriolar diameters were neither related to the risk of stroke (HR per SD decrease: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.93 to 1.13]) nor to the risk of cerebral infarction (HR: 1.02 [95% CI: 0.90 to 1.15]). After additional adjustment for other cardiovascular risk factors, the results did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Larger retinal venular diameters are associated with an increased risk of stroke and cerebral infarction. The role of venules in cerebrovascular disease warrants further exploration.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cognitive Impairment in the Aging Dialysis and Chronic Kidney Disease Populations: An Occult Burden
Murray, A. M. (2008) · Advances in Chronic Kidney Disease · doi:10.1053/j.ackd.2008.01.010 · Cited by 416
Seidelmann, S. B., Claggett, B., Bravo, P. E., Gupta, A., Farhad, H., Klein, B. E., Klein, R., Di Carli, M., & Solomon, S. D. (2016) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.116.023425 · Cited by 319
Retinal Microvasculature as a Model to Study the Manifestations of Hypertension
Cheung, C. Y.-L., Ikram, M. K., Sabanayagam, C., & Wong, T. Y. (2012) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hypertensionaha.111.189142 · Cited by 287
Self-citationQuantitative and qualitative retinal microvascular characteristics and blood pressure
Cheung, C. Y., Tay, W. T., Mitchell, P., Wang, J. J., Hsu, W., Lee, M. L., Lau, Q. P., Zhu, A. L., Klein, R., Saw, S. M., et al. (2011) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/hjh.0b013e328347266c · Cited by 255
The Rotterdam Study: 2010 objectives and design update
Hofman, A., Breteler, M. M. B., van Duijn, C. M., Janssen, H. L. A., Krestin, G. P., Kuipers, E. J., Stricker, B. H. C., Tiemeier, H., Uitterlinden, A. G., Vingerling, J. R., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1007/s10654-009-9386-z · Cited by 244
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ikram, M. K., de Jong, F. J., Bos, M. J., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., de Jong, P. T. V. M., & Breteler, M. M. B.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-05-09
- Volume
- 66
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1339-1343
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2097005219
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea
- The paper
- Ikram, M. K., de Jong, F. J., Bos, M. J., Vingerling, J. R., Hofman, A., Koudstaal, P. J., de Jong, P. T. V. M., & Breteler, M. M. B. (2006). Retinal vessel diameters and risk of stroke: The Rotterdam Study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000210533.24338.ea
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.