The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Incidence rates for internal carotid artery dissection (ICAD) have been reported to be 2.6 to 2.9 per 100,000, but reliable epidemiologic data for vertebral artery dissection (VAD) are not available. OBJECTIVE: To determine the incidence rate of cervical artery dissection (CAD) in a defined population. METHODS: With IRB approval, we used the medical record linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify all patients diagnosed with spontaneous ICAD and VAD for the period of 1987-2003 in Olmsted County, MN. RESULTS: Of 48 patients with CAD, there were 32 patients with ICAD and 18 patients with VAD. In Olmsted County, the average annual incidence rate for ICAD was 1.72 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.13 to 2.32) and for VAD 0.97 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 0.52 to 1.4). The average annual incidence rate for CAD was 2.6 per 100,000 population (95% CI, 1.86 to 3.33). The most frequently encountered symptoms in CAD were head or neck pain (80%), cerebral ischemia (TIA or infarct) (56%), and Horner syndrome (25%). Good outcome (defined as modified Rankin score of 0 to 2) was seen in 92% of patients. No recurrence of dissection was observed during a mean 7.8 years of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Internal carotid artery dissection was detected approximately twice as frequently as vertebral artery dissection in the overall study, but in the latter half of the study period, vertebral artery and internal carotid artery dissection incidence rates were equivalent. The majority of cervical artery dissection patients in the community have excellent outcome, and contrary to many tertiary referral series, re-dissection is rare.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project
Melton, L. J. (1996) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.4065/71.3.266 · Cited by 1,443
Cited by
Cervical-artery dissections: predisposing factors, diagnosis, and outcome
Debette, S., & Leys, D. (2009) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(09)70084-5 · Cited by 833
Epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of intracranial artery dissection
Debette, S., Compter, A., Labeyrie, M.-A., Uyttenboogaart, M., Metso, T. M., Majersik, J. J., Goeggel-Simonetti, B., Engelter, S. T., Pezzini, A., Bijlenga, P., et al. (2015) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00009-5 · Cited by 466
Franklin, B. A., Thompson, P. D., Al-Zaiti, S. S., Albert, C. M., Hivert, M.-F., Levine, B. D., Lobelo, F., Madan, K., Sharrief, A. Z., Eijsvogels, T. M. H., et al. (2020) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000749 · Cited by 410
Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences
Maaijwee, N. A. M. M., Rutten-Jacobs, L. C. A., Schaapsmeerders, P., van Dijk, E. J., & de Leeuw, F.-E. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.72 · Cited by 377
Cassidy, J. D., Boyle, E., Côté, P., He, Y., Hogg-Johnson, S., Silver, F. L., & Bondy, S. J. (2008) · Spine · doi:10.1097/brs.0b013e3181644600 · Cited by 287
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, V. H., Brown, R. D., Mandrekar, J. N., & Mokri, B.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2006-11-28
- Volume
- 67
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1809-1812
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2043328909
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 13.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71
- The paper
- Lee, V. H., Brown, R. D., Mandrekar, J. N., & Mokri, B. (2006). Incidence and outcome of cervical artery dissection: A population-based study. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000244486.30455.71
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.