Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Fever after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Risk factors and impact on outcome

Fernandez, A., Schmidt, J. M., Claassen, J., Pavlicova, M., Huddleston, D., Kreiter, K. T., Ostapkovich, N. D., Kowalski, R. G., Parra, A., Connolly, E. Sander, Mayer, S. A.·2007·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for refractory fever after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), and to determine the impact of temperature elevation on outcome. METHODS: We studied a consecutive cohort of 353 patients with SAH with a maximum daily temperature (T(max)) recorded on at least 7 days between SAH days 0 and 10. Fever (>38.3 degrees C) was routinely treated with acetaminophen and conventional water-circulating cooling blankets. We calculated daily T(max) above 37.0 degrees C, and defined extreme T(max) as daily excess above 38.3 degrees C. Global outcome at 90 days was evaluated with the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs) with the Lawton scale, and cognitive functioning with the Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status. Mixed-effects models were used to identify predictors of T(max), and logistic regression models to evaluate the impact of T(max) on outcome. RESULTS: Average daily T(max) was 1.15 degrees C (range 0.04 to 2.74 degrees C). The strongest predictors of fever were poor Hunt-Hess grade and intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) (both p < 0.001). After controlling for baseline outcome predictors, daily T(max) was associated with an increased risk of death or severe disability (mRS > or = 4, adjusted OR 3.0 per degrees C, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.8), loss of independence in IADLs (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.6), and cognitive impairment (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.2 to 5.1, all p < or = 0.02). These associations were even stronger when extreme T(max) was analyzed. CONCLUSION: Treatment-refractory fever during the first 10 days after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is predicted by poor clinical grade and intraventricular hemorrhage, and is associated with increased mortality and more functional disability and cognitive impairment among survivors. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate the impact of prophylactic fever control on outcome after SAH.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000258543.45879.f5

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 28 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Fernandez, A., Schmidt, J. M., Claassen, J., Pavlicova, M., Huddleston, D., Kreiter, K. T., Ostapkovich, N. D., Kowalski, R. G., Parra, A., Connolly, E. S., & Mayer, S. A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2007-03-27
Volume
68
Issue
13
Pages
1013-1019
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2071501210
Cited by
262
References
28
FWCI
12.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fever after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Risk factors and impact on outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000258543.45879.f5
The paper
Fernandez, A., Schmidt, J. M., Claassen, J., Pavlicova, M., Huddleston, D., Kreiter, K. T., Ostapkovich, N. D., Kowalski, R. G., Parra, A., Connolly, E. S., & Mayer, S. A. (2007). Fever after subarachnoid hemorrhage: Risk factors and impact on outcome. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000258543.45879.f5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.