CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 109Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchReligion, Spirituality, and PsychologyAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease: Impact of spirituality, religiosity, and QOL

Kaufman, Yakir, Anaki, David, Binns, Malcolm, Freedman, Morris·2007·Neurology
DOI 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260697.66617.59
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess effects of quality of life (QOL), spirituality, and religiosity on rate of progression of cognitive decline in Alzheimer disease (AD). METHODS: In this longitudinal study, we recruited 70 patients with probable AD. The Mini-Mental State Examination was used to monitor the rate of cognitive decline. Religiosity and spirituality were measured using standardized scales that assess spirituality, religiosity, and organizational and private religious practices. We conducted a simultaneous multiple linear regression analysis for factors contributing to rate of cognitive decline. RESULTS: After controlling for baseline level of cognition, age, sex, and education, a slower rate of cognitive decline was associated with higher levels of spirituality (p < 0.05) and private religious practices (p < 0.005). These variables accounted for 17% of the total variance [F(11,58) = 2.24, p < 0.05]. There was no correlation between rate of cognitive decline and QOL. CONCLUSION: Higher levels of spirituality and private religious practices, but not quality of life, are associated with slower progression of Alzheimer disease.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000260697.66617.59

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Idler EL, Kasl SV. Religion among disabled and nondisabled persons I: cross-sectional patterns in health practices, social activities, and well-being. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci 1997;52:S294–S305.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Kaufman, Y., Anaki, D., Binns, M., & Freedman, M.
Affiliations
Mount Sinai Hospital (CA)
ORCID
Venue
Neurology
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2007-05
Volume
68
Issue
18
Pages
1509-1514
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
DOI
10.1212/01.wnl.0000260697.66617.59
OpenAlex
W2086822026
Cited by
109
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline, spirituality, religiosity, private religious practice, quality of life, disease progression, religious coping
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alzheimer Disease, Cognition Disorders, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Religion and Psychology, Disease Progression, Spirituality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review