The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Neurophysiologic study of central pain in patients with Parkinson disease
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Patients with Parkinson disease (PD) may present with various types of pain. In some instances, no cause can be identified and pain is considered a primary disorder (primary central pain [PCP]). We hypothesized that PCP in patients with PD (PD-PCP) may be due to a dysfunction of pain pathways or the processing of pain inputs in the CNS. METHODS: We carried out a psychophysical and neurophysiologic study in 9 patients with PD-PCP, 9 patients with PD without pain (PD-NoP), and 9 healthy control subjects. We assessed the clinical characteristics of pain, performed quantitative sensory testing with thermal probes, and recorded laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) and laser-induced sudomotor skin responses (1-SSRs) in "off" and "on" conditions. RESULTS: In "off" condition, patients with PD-PCP had lower heat pain and laser pinprick thresholds, higher LEP amplitudes, and less habituation of the l-SSR in comparison with PD-NoP patients and control subjects. Abnormalities were more marked in the most affected side. In "on" condition, psychophysical and neurophysiologic differences disappeared or were significantly attenuated. CONCLUSION: Conduction along peripheral and central pain pathways is normal in patients with Parkinson disease with or without primary central pain. However, apart from signs of hyperalgesia, our patients exhibited lack of habituation of sympathetic sudomotor responses to repetitive pain stimuli, suggesting an abnormal control of the effects of pain inputs on autonomic centers. Abnormalities were attenuated by l-dopa, suggesting that the dysfunction may occur in dopamine-dependent centers regulating both autonomic function and inhibitory modulation of pain inputs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Staging of brain pathology related to sporadic Parkinson’s disease
Braak, H., Tredici, K. D., Rüb, U., de Vos, R. A. I., Jansen Steur, E. N. H., & Braak, E. (2003) · Neurobiology of Aging · doi:10.1016/s0197-4580(02)00065-9 · Cited by 10,777
Cited by
Pain in Parkinson’s disease: Prevalence and characteristics
Beiske, A. G., Loge, J. H., Rønningen, A., & Svensson, E. (2009) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2008.12.004 · Cited by 503
Altered processing of sensory stimuli in patients with migraine
de Tommaso, M., Ambrosini, A., Brighina, F., Coppola, G., Perrotta, A., Pierelli, F., Sandrini, G., Valeriani, M., Marinazzo, D., Stramaglia, S., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Neurology · doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.14 · Cited by 329
Borsook, D., Upadhyay, J., Chudler, E. H., & Becerra, L. (2010) · Molecular Pain · doi:10.1186/1744-8069-6-27 · Cited by 326
Kumru, H., Soler, D., Vidal, J., Navarro, X., Tormos, J. M., Pascual‐Leone, A., & Valls‐Sole, J. (2013) · European Journal of Pain · doi:10.1002/j.1532-2149.2012.00167.x · Cited by 83
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Schestatsky, P., Kumru, H., Valls-Solé, J., Valldeoriola, F., Marti, M. J., Tolosa, E., & Chaves, M. L.
- Venue
- Neurology
- Published
- 2007-12-04
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2162-2169
- ISSN
- 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
- 1526-632X
- OpenAlex
- W2162816987
- Cited by
- 226
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neurophysiologic study of central pain in patients with Parkinson disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000295669.12443.d3
- The paper
- Schestatsky, P., Kumru, H., Valls-Solé, J., Valldeoriola, F., Marti, M. J., Tolosa, E., & Chaves, M. L. (2007). Neurophysiologic study of central pain in patients with Parkinson disease. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000295669.12443.d3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.