Cited by 105Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesPolyomavirus and related diseasesPeripheral Neuropathies and Disorders

Vanishing MS T2-bright lesions before puberty: A distinct MRI phenotype?

Chabas, D., Castillo-Trivino, T., Mowry, E. M., Strober, J. B., Glenn, O. A., Waubant, E.·2008·Neurology

Abstract

Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) onset before puberty may have a distinct clinical presentation. Pediatric patients with MS may less often meet MRI diagnostic criteria for adults. Whether initial MRI presentation is distinct in prepubertal patients is unknown. Methods We queried the UCSF MS database for pediatric patients with MS (onset or=11 years) pediatric MS. The next available brain MRI scan was used to evaluate lesion resolution. Results Thirteen children with EOPMS (median age 8.90 years, range [3.58-10.98], 38% girls) and 18 with LOPMS (median age 14.47 years, range [11.78-18.00], 61% girls) were identified. While the overall number of T2-bright lesions was similar in the two groups, patients with EOPMS had fewer well-defined ovoid T2-bright lesions (median = 7, range [0-29] vs 21.5, [4-100]; p = 0.004) and more often had confluent lesions (31% of patients vs 0%; p = 0.02) on their first MRI compared with patients with LOPMS. Ninety-two percent of patients with EOPMS had a reduction in the number of T2-bright lesions on the second scan compared to 29% of patients with LOPMS (p = 0.002). Conclusions The distinct prepubertal multiple sclerosis (MS) MRI phenotype suggests that underlying biologic processes may differ in earlier-onset pediatric MS compared to later-onset pediatric MS. These findings may delay diagnosis in that age range. MRI criteria for MS diagnosis may need to be revised before puberty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000326896.66714.ae

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MRI findings in younger children with MS may include large, confluent T2-hyperintense lesions that show remarkable resolution on followup scans.

    “MRI findings may include large, confluent T2-hyperintense lesions that show remarkable resolution on followup scans.33”

    From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [33]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chabas, D., Castillo-Trivino, T., Mowry, E. M., Strober, J. B., Glenn, O. A., & Waubant, E.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • From UCSF Regional Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis Center (D.C., T.C.-T., E.M.M., J.B.S., E.W.), San Francisco; and Department of Radiology (O.A.G.), UCSF, San Francisco, CA.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2008-09-30
Volume
71
Issue
14
Pages
1090-1093
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2095785974
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 11
FWCI
6.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Polyomavirus and related diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, pediatric multiple sclerosis, early-onset multiple sclerosis, lesion resolution, prepubertal onset, MRI diagnostic criteria, gadolinium-enhancing lesions
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Aging, Brain, Child, Child, Preschool, Diagnosis, Differential, Female, Humans, Male, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Phenotype, Predictive Value of Tests, Puberty, Recurrence, Remission, Spontaneous, Severity of Illness Index, Age of Onset, Disease Progression, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review