Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 414

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression

Open access
Menza, M., Dobkin, R. D., Marin, H., Mark, M. H., Gara, M., Buyske, S., Bienfait, K., Dicke, A.·2009·Neurology

Abstract

Background: Parkinson disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disease affecting up to 1 million individuals in the United States. Depression affects up to 50% of these patients and is associated with a variety of poor outcomes for patients and their families. Despite this, there are few evidence-based data to guide clinical care. Methods: An NIH-funded, randomized, controlled trial of paroxetine CR, nortriptyline, and placebo in 52 patients with PD and depression. The primary outcomes were the change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) and the percentage of depression responders at 8 weeks. Results: Nortriptyline was superior to placebo for the change in HAM-D (p < 0.002); paroxetine CR was not. There was a trend for superiority of nortriptyline over paroxetine CR at 8 weeks (p < 0.079). Response rates favored nortriptyline (p = 0.024): nortriptyline 53%, paroxetine CR 11%, placebo 24%. In planned contrasts of response rates, nortriptyline was superior to paroxetine CR (p = 0.034). Nortriptyline was also superior to placebo in many of the secondary outcomes, including sleep, anxiety, and social functioning, while paroxetine CR was not. Both active drug treatments were well tolerated. Conclusions: Though relatively modest in size, this is the largest placebo-controlled trial done to date in patients with Parkinson disease (PD) and depression. Nortriptyline was efficacious in the treatment of depression and paroxetine CR was not. When compared directly, nortriptyline produced significantly more responders than did paroxetine CR. The trial suggests that depression in patients with PD is responsive to treatment and raises questions about the relative efficacy of dual reuptake inhibitors and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. ARR = absolute risk reduction; DSM-IV = Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition; HAM-A = Hamilton Anxiety Scale; HAM-D = Hamilton Depression Rating Scale; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination; NNT = number needed to treat; PD = Parkinson disease; PDQ = Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; SCID = Structured Clinical Interview; SSRI = selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; TCA = tricyclic antidepressant; UPDRS = Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/01.wnl.0000336340.89821.b3

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 41 references

Cited by

See all 414

Metadata

Authors
Menza, M., Dobkin, R. D., Marin, H., Mark, M. H., Gara, M., Buyske, S., Bienfait, K., & Dicke, A.
Venue
Neurology
Published
2009-03-10
Volume
72
Issue
10
Pages
886-892
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2042158944
Cited by
414
References
41
FWCI
21.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1212/01.wnl.0000336340.89821.b3
The paper
Menza, M., Dobkin, R. D., Marin, H., Mark, M. H., Gara, M., Buyske, S., Bienfait, K., & Dicke, A. (2009). A controlled trial of antidepressants in patients with Parkinson disease and depression. Neurology. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000336340.89821.b3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.