Apraxia of speech involves lesions of dorsal arcuate fasciculus and insula in patients with aphasia
Open accessAbstract
OBJECTIVE: To determine the contributions of apraxia of speech (AOS) and anomia to conversational dysfluency. METHODS: In this observational study of 52 patients with chronic aphasia, 47 with concomitant AOS, fluency was quantified using correct information units per minute (CIUs/min) from propositional speech tasks. Videos of patients performing conversational, how-to and picture-description tasks, word and sentence repetition, and diadochokinetic tasks were used to diagnose AOS using the Apraxia of Speech Rating Scale (ASRS). Anomia was quantified by patients' scores on the 30 even-numbered items from the Boston Naming Test (BNT). RESULTS: Together, ASRS and BNT scores accounted for 51.4% of the total variance in CIUs/min; the ASRS score accounted for the majority of that variance. The BNT score was associated with lesions in the left superior temporal gyrus, left inferior frontal gyrus, and large parts of the insula. The global ASRS score was associated with lesions in the left dorsal arcuate fasciculus (AF), pre- and post-central gyri, and both banks of the central sulcus of the insula. The ASRS score for the primary distinguishing features of AOS (no overlap with features of aphasia) was associated with less AF and more insular involvement. Only ∼27% of this apraxia-specific lesion overlapped with lesions associated with the BNT score. Lesions associated with AOS had minimal overlap with the frontal aslant tract (FAT) (<1%) or the extreme capsule fiber tract (1.4%). Finally, ASRS scores correlated significantly with damage to the insula but not to the AF, extreme capsule, or FAT. CONCLUSIONS: Results are consistent with previous findings identifying lesions of the insula and AF in patients with AOS, damage to both of which may create dysfluency in patients with aphasia.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Damage to both banks of the superior central sulcus centred at MNI coordinates [−36, 1, 10] has consistently been associated with speech production impairments after stroke.
“damage to both banks of the superior central sulcus centred at MNI coordinates [−36, 1, 10] has consistently been associated with speech production impairments after stroke”
From Damage to Broca’s area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke (2021) · cites this paper as Chenausky et al., 2020
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 21
- Authors
- Chenausky, K., Paquette, S., Norton, A., & Schlaug, G.
- Affiliations
- Boston University (US)
- Sargent College (KC), Boston University; Department of Neurology (KC, SP, GS), Harvard Medical School; and Music, Neuroimaging, and Stroke Recovery Laboratory (KC, SP, AN, GS), Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston.
- Corresponding author
- Chenausky, Karen
- Paquette, Sébastien
- ORCID
- Chenausky, Karen
- Venue
- Neurology Clinical Practice
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 162-169
- ISSN
- 2163-0402 (ISSN-L)
- 2163-0933
- PMC
- PMC7156201
- OpenAlex
- W2964611172
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 1.75
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Neurology Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32DC013017)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
- Keywords
- apraxia of speech, aphasia, insula, anomia, Boston Naming Test, lesion localization, superior temporal gyrus, inferior frontal gyrus, frontal aslant tract, extreme capsule, diadochokinesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review