Cited by 383HIV Research and TreatmentHIV-related health complications and treatmentsInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Prevalence of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study

Open access
Sacktor, Ned, Skolasky, Richard L., Seaberg, Eric, Munro, Cynthia, Becker, James T., Martin, Eileen, Ragin, Ann, Levine, Andrew +1 more·2016·Neurology

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) in HIV+ individuals and determine whether the frequency of HAND changed over 4 years of follow-up. METHODS: The Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study (MACS) is a prospective study of gay/bisexual men. Beginning in 2007, all MACS participants received a full neuropsychological test battery and functional assessments every 2 years to allow for HAND classification. RESULTS: The frequency of HAND for the 364 HIV+ individuals seen in 2007-2008 was 33% and for the 197 HIV+ individuals seen at all time periods during the 2007-2008, 2009-2010, and 2011-2012 periods were 25%, 25%, and 31%, respectively. The overall frequency of HAND increased from 2009-2010 to 2011-2012 (p = 0.048). Over the 4-year study, 77% of the 197 HIV+ individuals remained at their same stage, with 13% showing deterioration and 10% showing improvement in HAND stage. Hypercholesterolemia was associated with HAND progression. A diagnosis of asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of symptomatic HAND compared to a diagnosis of normal cognition. CONCLUSION: HAND remains common in HIV+ individuals. However, for the majority of HIV+ individuals on combination antiretroviral therapy with systemic virologic suppression, the diagnosis of HAND is not a progressive condition over 4 years of follow-up. Future studies should evaluate longitudinal changes in HAND and specific neurocognitive domains over a longer time period.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1212/wnl.0000000000002277

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many HIV-1-positive individuals today still develop HIV-1-associated dementia despite improved prognosis with anti-retroviral therapy.

    “Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 prognosis greatly improved with the era of anti-retroviral therapy; however, many HIV-1-positive individuals today still develop HIV1-associated dementia (HAD) (292, 511).”

    From Blood-Brain Barrier: From Physiology to Disease and Back (2019) · cites this paper as [511]

    The Results report HAD in 5% of 364 HIV-positive participants in 2007–2008, showing that it persisted in the antiretroviral-therapy era. But the study measures prevalence, not how many people develop dementia, and 5% does not substantiate the claim’s emphasis on “many.” The Abstract also says HAD had become dramatically less frequent. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Cohen RA, Boland R, Paul R, et al. Neurocognitive performance enhanced by highly active antiretroviral therapy in HIV-infected women. AIDS 2001;15:341-345.
  2. Harezlak J, Buchthal S, Taylor M, et al. Persistence of HIV-associated cognitive impairment, inflammation, and neuronal injury in era of highly active antiretroviral treatment. AIDS 2011;25:625-633.
  3. Hua X, Boyle CP, Harezlak J, et al. Disrupted cerebral metabolite levels and lower nadir CD41 counts are linked to brain volume deficits in 210 HIV-infected patients on stable treatment. Neuroimage Clin 2013;3:132-142.
  4. Sacktor N, Skolasky RL, Seaberg E, et al. Prevalence of HIV-associated neurocogni- tive disorders in the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study. Neurology 2016;86:334-340.
  5. Seider TR, Luo X, Gongvatana A, et al. Verbal memory declines more rapidly with age in HIV infected versus uninfected adults. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2014;36:356-367.
  6. Disclosure: R. Cohen has received research support from the National Institutes of Health and has an endowed chair from the McKnight Brain Research Foundation. B. Navia has received research support from the National Institutes of Health. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. · DOI
  7. Dore GJ, McDonald A, Li Y, Kaldor JM, Brew BJ. Marked improvement in survival following AIDS demen- tia complex in the era of highly active antiretroviral ther- apy. AIDS 2003;17:1539-1545.
  8. Heaton RK, Franklin DR, Ellis RJ, et al. HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders before and during the era of com- bination antiretroviral therapy: differences in rates, nature, and predictors. J Neurovirol 2011;17:3-16.
  9. Sacktor N, Lyles RH, Skolasky R, et al. HIV-associated neurologic disease incidence changes: Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, 1990-1998. Neurology 2001;56:257-260.
  10. Woods SP, Rippeth JD, Frol AB, et al. Interrater reliability of clinical ratings and neurocognitive diagnoses in HIV. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2004;26:759-778.
  11. Berg BA, Hsu HP. Metropolis simulations of Met- Enkephalin with solvent-accessible area parametrizations. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys 2004;69:026703.
  12. Fishman GS. Monte Carlo: Concepts, Algorithms, and Applications. New York: Springer; 1995.
  13. Heaton RK, Franklin DR Jr, Deutsch R, et al. Neuro- cognitive change in the era of HIV combination antiretro- viral therapy: the longitudinal CHARTER study. Clin Infect Dis 2015;60:473-480.
  14. Cole MA, Margolick JB, Cox C, et al. Longitudinally pre- served psychomotor performance in long-term asymptomatic HIV-infected individuals. Neurology 2007;69:2213-2220.
  15. Grant I, Franklin DR Jr, Deutsch R, et al. Asymptomatic HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment increases risk for symptomatic decline. Neurology 2014;82:2055-2062.
  16. Heaton RK, Clifford DB, Franklin DR Jr, et al. HIV- associated neurocognitive disorders persist in the era of potent antiretroviral therapy: CHARTER Study. Neurology 2010;75:2087-2096.
  17. Becker JT, Sanders J, Madsen SK, et al. Subcortical brain atrophy persists even in HAART-regulated HIV disease. Brain Imaging Behav 2011;5:77-85.
  18. Becker JT, Maruca V, Kingsley LA, et al. Factors affecting brain structure in men with HIV disease in the post- HAART era. Neuroradiology 2012;54:113-121.
  19. Hagberg L, Cinque P, Gisslen M, et al. Cerebrospinal fluid neopterin: an informative biomarker of central ner- vous system immune activation in HIV-1 infection. AIDS Res Ther 2010;7:15.
  20. Jessen Krut J, Mellberg T, Price RW, et al. Biomarker evidence of axonal injury in neuroasymptomatic HIV-1 pa- tients. PLoS One 2014;9:e88591.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sacktor, N., Skolasky, R. L., Seaberg, E., Munro, C., Becker, J. T., Martin, E., Ragin, A., Levine, A., & Miller, E.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Venue
Neurology
Published
2016-01-26
Volume
86
Issue
4
Pages
334-340
ISSN
  • 0028-3878 (ISSN-L)
  • 1526-632X
OpenAlex
W2342035923
Cited by
383
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 51 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 37 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 1
FWCI
15.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neurology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Brain Research Foundation
  • McKnight Foundation
  • Evelyn F. McKnight Brain Research Foundation
  • Northwestern University (U01-AI35039)
  • Johns Hopkins University (U01-AI35039, UM1-AI35043, U01-AI35040)
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR000424, UM1-AI35043)
  • Feinberg School of Medicine (U01-AI35040)
  • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health (U01-AI35039)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH075673, P30MH075673)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (UM1AI035043, U01AI035040, AI035042, U01AI035039, U01AI035042)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS081196, NS081196)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Virology › HIV Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › HIV-related health complications and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders, prevalence, Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, gay and bisexual men, asymptomatic neurocognitive impairment, hypercholesterolemia, highly active antiretroviral therapy, viral suppression, neuropsychological assessment, functional assessment
MeSH terms
Adult, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypercholesterolemia, Male, Middle Aged, Neuropsychological Tests, Severity of Illness Index, AIDS Dementia Complex, Comorbidity, Prevalence, Disease Progression, Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review